|Router Security||Router attacks in the news||
Website by |
Routers in the news, pretty much means routers getting exploited by bad guys to do bad things. I am still waiting for a good news story about routers. The flaws that are exploited are documented on the Bugs page. Articles that offer security advice are listed on the Other router security advice page.
Asus router fails to get online
by me July 1, 2021
I am setting up and configuring an Asus AC1900P router. I started in early May and was forced to chose between beta firmware and known buggy firmware. I blogged about this here: Asus router firmware: How do you prefer your bugs? New or Old?. By the end of June there was new firmware (version 22.214.171.124.386_43129) which I installed. As I suggest on the New Router page, the router was not directly connected to the Internet, instead it was on my LAN. Specifically, its WAN port was connected to a LAN port of my existing router. The problems began immediately and I will not bother with most of the details. What I thought was a minor thing, turned out to be, I think, the one problem from which all others stemmed: the router incorrectly thought it was off-line. Eventually, it occurred to me to validate this using the tools built into the firmware, specifically at Network tools -> Network analysis. First, I pinged a couple websites and all was well. Then I ran a couple nslookup commands and, again, all was well. As expected, the DNS server was that of my existing router. Then, I tried netstat. Just after a cold boot, with no device connected to the router (other than a computer on my LAN that logged into it via Ethernet Remote Access) this screen shot shows the router was very much involved with a.applovin.com. Applovin does mobile app advertising and because of this, a.applovin.com was blocked on my LAN. The previous firmware (beta version 126.96.36.199.386.41994) ran just fine on the same LAN. The firmware history shows that the current firmware (version 188.8.131.52.386_43129) is twice the size of the previous firmware. A lot must have changed.
I posted a question about this on Reddit and got no response. I also posted a question about it on the SmallNetBuilder forum, and got no useful response. Asus has no forum (that I could find).
Update July 2, 2021: The router is not involved with applovin.com. The domain a.applovin.com was blocked via DNS, specifically, a query for that sub-domain returned an IP address of zero. Many domains on my LAN are blocked this way, a.applovin.com is the first when sorted alphabetically. After testing again today, I ran netstat with the option to resolve names disabled. This showed many connections to IP address zero. When trying to get a name for IP address zero, netstat must have been given a.applovin.com by the main/outer router. Still, the router thinks it is off-line. The main page displays its LAN IP address (192.168.1.something) for a second, then complains about being disconnected. My testing today included a log of all outgoing packets from the router. The log showed that the router made a UDP request to port 19302 at IP address 184.108.40.206 which belongs to Google. A previous log of all router activity as it starts up also showed a UDP request to port 19302, but that time, the IP address was 220.127.116.11. This too is Google. In each case, these were the only requests the router made to the Internet. Researching the UDP port, I learned that it is used by Google STUN servers and can provide the client (the Asus router) with its public IP address. In both instances, the router made these Google STUN requests 8 seconds after it was assigned a LAN side IP address by the other router. The Asus router log file includes this message "WAN Connection: ISP's DHCP did not function properly." Clearly there is a bug in how the router determines if it is online or not. What to do? I changed the WAN type from DHCP to Fixed IP address and assigned it the same LAN-side IP address it was already using. After a reboot, all was well. What a pain.
Some vague Zyxel problem
Hackers are using unknown user accounts to target Zyxel firewalls and VPNs
by Dan Goodin of Ars Technica June 24, 2021
Vague, vague vague. My take-away from this article is that no one knows what is going on. What does "access a device" mean? Bypass what authentication? My guess is that this issue, whatever it is, is very bad, and the vague explanation is designed to hide this. Smells like there are backdoor accounts in the vulnerable devices. Maybe. Glad that they sent a SOP to all registered users. What's a SOP?
Article by Dong Ngo
Router Management: Web Interface vs. App and the Trend Linksys Typifies
by Dong Ngo May 29, 2021
Interesting article. Ngo sees and tests many more routers than I do, so he has a good perspective. Quoting:
=> There’s been a trend in home networking that forces or coerces users into signing up for a login account with the vendor and associate their home network with it. It all started with the eero. Nowadays, you’ll find this type of practice common in many vendors, though not all ... Asus is one of a few vendors that provide a mobile app that works without a login account.
=> ... the [mobile] app itself is not inherently bad. Rather it’s the intention behind the app that can be problematic. That’s especially true when a vendor attempts to turn you into a product via the app. Have you ever wonder how exactly the app on your phone is linked to the router at home? There’s no magic. You likely pay for that with your personal information. In fact, the mining of personal information is so lucrative that many vendors - such as Google or Amazon - have gone as far as taking the web interface entirely out of their home networking devices and make the app the only option. Others try to coerce users into the app artificially ... ever wonder why a vendor would like to collect data from your network, the answer is, among other things, advertising. Your online habits reveal a lot about what you have bought and are going to buy. This type of information, collected over time, is a gold mine for the receiving end. In other words, you become the product.
=> On top of that, there are also security risks. That’s because the vendor itself can be hacked, and when that happens, you have no idea who gets a hold of the data collected from your home network and what they’re going to do with it.
He explains how to use avoid creating a Linksys account while still being able to configure a Linksys router using the web interface.
An Asus router offers nothing but bugs
Asus router firmware: How do you prefer your bugs? New or Old?
by Michael Horowitz (me) May 11, 2021
I am looking to update the firmware on an Asus RT-AC1900P router and I end up with a very bad choice. I am manually reviewing the latest firmware (dated February 1, 2021) because the automatic check for updates in the router failed. No matter. The most recent firmware is in Beta status which no normal router user/administrator would normally want any part of. But, this Beta software has a large number of security bug fixes. So, the choice is either to install firmware with old, known bugs or new untested Beta firmware with new bugs. Router firmware should not remain in Beta status for over three months. Makes you wonder if Asus is even working on testing it.
Update: Firmware version 18.104.22.168.386.43129 was released May 21, 2021 with fixes for seven known bugs (aka CVEs).
Why its hard to trust any Asus router
CVE-2021-32030: ASUS GT-AC2900 Authentication Bypass
by Chris Bellows of Atredis Partners May 6, 2021
There is a bug in the ASUS GT-AC2900 router (aka RT-AC2900). It currently sells for about $170 and was released around January 2018. The bug has to do with validating the cookie that governs the current state of the web interface. Bugs in the validation can let someone get at the router without knowing the password. In techie lingo, its an authentication bypass vulnerability. Asus was informed of the problem March 16, 2021 and issued patched firmware April 28, 2021. That's the dull and boring part. The interesting part is the reaction from Asus. Sure, they fixed the bug in the RT-AC2900 but what about the many other Asus router models? It is very likely they share the same bug. But, Asus never issued a security advisory, so we have no way to know if their other routers are also buggy. It's none of our business.
Update: I mis-understood the flaws because in listing them, Bellows did not use either "and" or "or". I read it as three different flaws, which was wrong. All three conditions have to be true to trigger the flaw, not any one of them.
Here we go again - lots of old and vulnerable routers
Which? warns that more than 2 million Brits are on old and insecure
routers – wagging a finger at Huawei-made kit
by Gareth Corfield for The Register May 6, 2021
That millions of routers run old buggy software is not news. This time, the report is out of England from consumer organization Which? (the question mark is part of their name). In December 2020 Which? surveyed more than 6,000 UK adults, asking them which routers they were using at home. From this, they identified 13 older routers that are still commonly used and had them evaluated by security specialists at Red Maple Technologies. Nine of the 13 routers did not meet modern security standards. ISP-branded routers are typically white-label devices from China. Recent vendors to UK ISPs have been Huawei and ZTE. One big issue was the lack of firmware (router software) updates. They estimate that 6 million Britons are using routers that were last updated in 2018, and, of those, 2.4 million routers have not been updated for five years. The worst offenders were the Sky SR101 and SR102, the TalkTalk HG523a, HG635 and HG533 and the Virgin Media Super Hub and Super Hub 2. This came up because England is considering a law that would require phone, tablet, and IoT vendors to publish a drop dead date for security updates on new devices. Another issue was weak default passwords that can be easily guessed by attackers from anywhere in the world. Routers with weak passwords were from Sky, TalkTalk, Virgin Media and Vodafone. Perhaps the worst router was the TalkTalk HG533 made by Huawei and released in 2013. Huawei was warned in 2013 of a vulnerability involving UPnP. They claimed it was fixed in 2014, but they never actually fixed it. The same vulnerability was re-discovered in 2017 by a different group of security researchers. The current evaluation found that the HG533 has weak passwords and is not being updated. The worst ISP seems to be Virgin Media because they "... told Which? to stuff off when its researchers came wagging their fingers disapprovingly". In other words: go away kid, don't bother me. Virgin Media "... did not recognise or accept the findings of the Which? research ..." The only good news is that old routers from both BT and Plusnet had received recent updates and had no security issues.
F**k Microsoft - they removed this site from Bing and DuckDuckGo and Yahoo and AOL
April 23, 2021. Microsoft does not want you to see this website.
This site is not promoted in any way. There are, for example, no ads for it. And, for whatever reason, no articles about Router Security ever mention this site, let alone link to it. So, when it disappears from a search engine, it disappears. Do a search for "router security" on Google and this site is currently, the top hit. The same is true at Startpage, Yandex and Baidu. Yet, it is nowhere to be found on either DuckDuckGo or Microsoft's Bing. By this, I do not mean that it is on the second page of search results, it does not exist at all. DuckDuckGo says: "We also of course have more traditional links in the search results, which we also source from multiple partners, though most commonly from Bing (and none from Google)." Elsewhere they say: "We get our results from various sources but mostly Bing, Yahoo and Yandex ...". I forgot Yahoo existed. Sure enough, this site is also missing from a Yahoo search for "router security". I don't think Yahoo really has their own search engine, I think they partner with Bing. So, my guess is that Bing is the real culprit. If a site is removed from Bing, it will probably not appear in DuckDuckGo or Yahoo. Granted, I am no expert on this. Could someone have reported this site as bad to Bing? Microsoft makes it pretty easy to ask for a site to be removed. I doubt they notify the site owner. I also doubt they do much Due Diligence.
April 24: Someone emailed me today saying that this site is the top hit for him at DuckDuckGo. Yet, I don't see it at all and I tried DuckDuckGo on multiple computers with multiple browsers and, thanks to a VPN, from multiple IP addresses. Additional testing showed that this site only appears for him with the Lynx text-based browser on Linux. When he uses normal Firefox, the site does not appear. I can not explain this.
April 25: I did some digging through history and found some referrals from cn.bing.com. So, whatever it is about this site that Bing considers bad, illegal or offensive, does not apply to China. I could not determine when the ban took place. But, in looking at the old server logs, I also saw referrals from search.aol.com. The AOL search is also powered by Bing.
April 27: I'm back ... it seems that feedback I submitted to Bing and DuckDuckGo had an effect.
May 6: Demoted again. This site is no longer the top site on Bing when searching for "router security". It remains the top site on Google. The top results, in sequence, are: Norton, TomsGuide, BestBuy (wow what a screw-up), Microsoft, BestBuy again, Wired, pcworld, foxnews, lifewire, zdnet on recent news, welivesecurity also on recent news, usatoday, and then the Test Your Router page on this site. Foxnews for router security? BestBuy? USA Today? Is Microsoft screwing with me or can they really be that bad at this?
May 15: Adding insult to injury. Not only does Bing rank this site lower than it used to, but the top "router security" web page is just awful. It is one of the worst articles on router security that I have ever seen. More on my blog: Bing prefers miserable Router Security advice
May 16: It seems that Bing treats the last date on a page as the Last Updated date. On this site, the last date is usually the page creation date, so, perhaps Bing is ranking the pages low because it thinks they are old. I am doing a test. The last date that physically appears on each page is now May 14, 2021. Time will tell . . .
Still more misery with IoT
100 Million More IoT Devices Are Exposed - and They Won't Be the Last
by Lily Hay Newman of Wired April 13, 2021
I consider this router news because it is yet another reason to segment your home network (LAN). For more on this concept, see the VLAN page. Over the last few years, researchers have found a large number of vulnerabilities in the software that underpins how devices communicate, both within a LAN and on the Internet. The communication software is known as a TCP/IP stack. This article is about the latest group of bugs, a set of nine vulnerabilities that are estimated to affect 100 million devices, including internet-of-things (IoT) devices and IT management servers. The bugs are in four different, and popular, TCP/IP stacks. The most famous of the four is included in FreeBSD, which underlies routers running both pfSense and OPNsense. The other three TCP/IP stacks are Nucleus NET (from the industrial control firm Siemens), IPnet and NetX. Exploiting the bugs, an attacker can either crash the vulnerable device or, perhaps, take control of it. Patches have been issued for all nine bugs but many devices will not and/or can not be updated. Similar flaws in other TCP/IP stacks have exposed hundreds of millions of devices to potential hacking. Why are there so many bugs in such fundamental software? An expert is quoted saying "A lot of it is about lack of economic incentives to really focus on the quality of this code."
Portable Verizon 4G hotspot is a fire hazard
Verizon Recalls 2.5M Ellipsis Jetpack Mobile Hot Spots Over Fire Hazard
by Allen St. John of Consumer Reports April 8, 2021
To the public, its a 4G hotspot, but to me, its a router. Verizon is recalling about 2.5 million Ellipsis Jetpack mobile hot spot devices with lithium-ion batteries that have overheated. The specific models are: MHS900L, MHS900LS and MHS900LPP. Verizon is offering a free exchange, replacing the Jetpacks with an Orbic Speed hot spot.
No Cisco for me
Cisco Will Not Patch Critical RCE Flaw Affecting End-of-Life Business Routers
by Ravie Lakshmanan of Hacker News April 9, 2021
There are many instances, documented in both the News and Bugs pages of this site, of critical flaws in Cisco software. There have been so many huge security flaws in Cisco software that I don't bother including them all here. The concept became clear long ago - they are not trustworthy. Cisco just issued fixes for still more critical bugs (Cisco fixes bug allowing remote code execution with root privileges) but the point here is about a bug they did not fix. Specifically, the bug identified as CVE-2021-1459, which exists in the web-based management interface of the Cisco Small Business routers RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W. The bug is as severe as severe gets, an unauthenticated bad guy can execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable device. But, these devices are too old to bother with. Quoting the company: "Cisco has not released and will not release software updates to address the vulnerability ... The Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers have entered the end-of-life process ... Customers are encouraged to migrate to the Cisco Small Business RV132W, RV160, or RV160W Routers." I agree that owners of buggy devices need to buy new hardware, but at this point, you could not pay me to use hardware from Cisco (or Ubiquiti for that matter). It is interesting to note that when a bug is really bad, as this one is, Microsoft will make an exception, and issue a patch for no-longer-supported software.
Bombshell revelation about Ubiquiti
Whistleblower: Ubiquiti Breach Catastrophic
by Brian Krebs of KrebsOnSecurity.com March 30 ,2021
Quoting: "On Jan. 11, Ubiquiti Inc.... disclosed that a breach involving a third-party cloud provider had exposed customer account credentials. Now a source who participated in the response to that breach alleges Ubiquiti massively downplayed a 'catastrophic' incident to minimize the hit to its stock price, and that the third-party cloud provider claim was a fabrication ... It was catastrophically worse than reported, and legal silenced and overruled efforts to decisively protect customers. The breach was massive, customer data was at risk, access to customers' devices deployed in corporations and homes around the world was at risk." And, more details: "The whistleblower claims that 'attacker(s) had access to privileged credentials ... and gained root administrator access to all Ubiquiti AWS accounts, including all S3 data buckets, all application logs, all databases, all user database credentials, and secrets required to forge single sign-on (SSO) cookies. Such access could have allowed the intruders to remotely authenticate to countless Ubiquiti cloud-based devices around the world. " At times like this, you might expect a company to force all users to change their password the next time they logon. Instead, Ubiquiti sent out emails, that were flagged as SPAM, so some users never saw them, that suggested changing their password. I spent 10 years as a Database Administrator so this point really hit home: Ubiquiti had no logging configured for the critical databases that the attacker(s) gained access to. Thus, they have no clue what the bad guys did. This is malpractice and is a great reason not to trust them going forward. Ubiquiti took a full day to respond to these charges and their response was half-hearted and did not fully deny all these charges. Oh, and the attackers also provided proof they had stolen Ubiquiti's source code. Some points:
Update: April 4, 2021. Ubiquiti All But Confirms Breach Response Iniquity by Brian Krebs. Four days after the above disclosure, the company issues a public statement that confirms and reinforces the claims in the first article. Nothing was denied.
From other sources
NAT traversal issues
NAT Slipstreaming v2.0: New Attack Variant Can Expose All Internal Network Devices to The Internet
by Ben Seri of Armis February 2021
There are two industry issues that affect many routers. Rather than being bugs, they are design flaws in Application Layer Gateway (ALG) software. In late October 2020, respected security researcher Samy Kamkar figured out a way to poke a hole in the router firewall that opened up access to a computer visiting a malicious web page. This initial version of the NAT Slipstreaming attack abuses the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) protocol and ports 5060 and 5061. The second generation attack abuses the H.323 multimedia protocol to open firewall holes to any LAN side device. It depends on sending TCP traffic out to port 1720 (for call forwarding). In response to these issues, web browsers have blocked some outbound ports. Armis, which developed the second generation attack said "The real fix would be every user and sysadmin disabling all ALGs, as this feature is fundamentally broken." In response to the second generation attach, Chrome not only blocked port 1720, it also blocked 69, 137, 161, 1719, 1723, and 6566. The other TCP ports "are known to be inspected by NAT devices and may be subject to similar exploitation." As for routers, the obvious solution is to disable the ALGs. On the Stuff to Turn Off page here, I provide screen shots and summaries of the varying ALG support from AmpliFi, Asus, DrayTek, Eero, Google Nest, Linksys, Peplink, TP-Link and UniFi. Routers that provide outbound firewall rules can be configured to block these same ports. This is a more complete solution.
Ports to block for v1: 5060 and 5061
Ports to block for v2: 69, 137, 161, 1719,1720, 1723 and 6566
Port later blocked: 554
Ubiquiti is hacked and lies about it
Ubiquiti tells customers to change passwords after security breach
by Catalin Cimpanu of ZDNet January 11, 2021
"According to Ubiquiti, the intruder accessed servers that stored data on UI.com users, such as names, email addresses, and salted and hashed passwords. Home addresses and phone numbers may have also been exposed ... How many Ubiquiti users are impacted and how the data breach occurred remains a mystery ... A Ubiquiti spokesperson did not immediately return a request for comment send before this article's publication ... Despite the bad news to its customers, Ubiquiti said that it had not seen any unauthorized access to customer accounts as a result of this incident. The company is now asking all users who receive the email to change their account passwords and turn on two-factor authentication. While initially, some users looked at the emails as a phishing attempt, a Ubiquiti tech support staffer confirmed that they were authentic on the company's forums."
My take: I have installed two AmpliFi systems and this left me annoyed as heck because I was not sure if the problem affected me or not, which is pretty trivial to convey. Do I need to change the router password? The Wi-Fi password? I bought one from the Ubiquiti website (store.amplifi.com) and had to create an account there. Is that part of the breach? None of my business. I logged into the site to change my password and there is no change password function. You can't make this stuff up. Do AmpliFi customers have a Ubiquiti account if they purchased the hardware elsewhere? Dunno. No more Ubiquiti for me. We did not know they were lying about much of the problem until March 2021.
A huge number of security problems with FiberHome routers
Multiple backdoors and vulnerabilities discovered in FiberHome routers
by Catalin Cimpanu of ZDNet January 18, 2021
Anyone with an optical fiber connection to the Internet has an Optical Network Terminal that converts optical signals into Ethernet and Wi-Fi data packets. Chinese company FiberHome makes a HG6245D model ONT/router that is a security disaster. The HG6245D is widely deployed in South America and Southeast Asia. News of these flaws comes from Pierre Kim who has reported many other router bugs in the past. He was supposed to give a presentation on the problems at a conference that was cancelled due to the pandemic. Not only were there many security flaws (too many to count) there were also 28 backdoor accounts. Geeze. What does the company have to say for itself. Nothing. Quoting: "Requests for comment sent by ZDNet to FiberHome via email and its official website last Thursday, January 14, remained unanswered at the time of writing."
A great reason to avoid Zyxel devices
Backdoor account discovered in more than 100,000 Zyxel firewalls, VPN gateways
by Catalin Cimpanu of ZDNet January 2, 2021
Quoting: "More than 100,000 Zyxel firewalls, VPN gateways, and access point controllers contain a hardcoded admin-level backdoor account that can grant attackers root access to devices via either the SSH interface or the web administration panel." This is as bad as bad gets. It is a great reason to avoid all Zyxel hardware. According to Dutch security firm Eye Control, the username and password were visible in a firmware executable file. The userid is not visible to an administrator of the device and its password can not be changed. Eye Control reports that since the SSL VPN on these devices operates on the same port as the web interface, a lot of them have exposed port 443 to the Internet. Patches are available.
TP-Link Access Point has a back door - a hidden Wi-Fi network
by Jon Aubrey December 1, 2020
The Access Point (AP) in question is the TP-Link TL-WA701ND. Jon uses it to connect an Ethernet-only device to his home Wi-Fi network. The tweet thread starts with "One day while I was scanning around my house for WiFi networks I noticed a high-powered WiFi network with a hidden SSID broadcasting from my main office. With a little more investigation I determined this was coming from the TP-Link, but what was it?" Not only was the network not broadcasting its SSID, there was also nothing about its existence in the user interface of the device. Really hidden. You could stop right there, as this tells you everything you need to know about TP-Link. He very impressively hacked the router and learned the SSID of the network and logged in to it. Quoting: "The hidden network in this case is bridging with the other WiFi network that I told the client to connect to, so we have a backdoor into my home network, not fun." The important lesson here is for buying a router from a company you can trust. This is a lesson the New York Times has not learned, all they care about in reviewing routers is speed. In their WireCutter division the top two recommended routers are both from TP-Link.
Apple pokes holes in macOS firewalls for their own use
Apple's own programs bypass firewalls and VPNs in Big Sur
by Anders Lundberg of MacWorld November 18, 2020
Apple has modified the guts of the Big Sur edition of macOS (aka macOS 11) to poke a hole in some (not all) outgoing firewalls for their own corporate use. 56 Apple apps and processes, such as FaceTime, iMessage, iCloud, Maps and Siri can no longer be contained by bypassed firewall software running on the system. They also made their own software immune to the previously-mandatory network changes imposed by some (not all) VPN client software running on macOS. This too, can be thought of as poking a hole in the firewall, though the official term is a VPN leak. Some worry that bad guys can use this new system to piggy-back on the Apple exceptions/holes and bypass firewalls and VPNs. To everyone else, this is a macOS story. To me, it is a router story. Regardless of the operating system on any computing device, the router is the top dog. It can, for example, block all access to the outside world that does not go through the VPN tunnel. Perhaps not easy to configure, but its possible, at least with professional grade routers (pfSense and Peplink for example). Some have suggested running a VPN client on the router to avoid any and all VPN leaks.
Auditing a Buggy Asus Router
At a recent hacking contest in China, bugs were found in two routers: the TP-Link TL-WDR7660 and the Asus RT-AX86U. The contest results were announced November 9, 2020. The TP-Link router is not sold in the US, there is no mention of it at www.tp-link.com/us/. The contest rules require the discovered flaws be disclosed to the vendor. I will watch Asus and see when they admit to the flaw and when they fix it. Perhaps most importantly, we will see if they patch just the one model or if they bother to investigate or say anything about similar models running similar firmware.
-->April 18, 2021: new firmware, version 22.214.171.124.386.42095, is dated March 18, 2021. It fixes a DoS vulnerability and these security bugs: CVE-2020-25681, CVE-2020-25682, CVE-2020-25683, CVE-2020-25687, CVE-2020-25684, CVE-2020-25685, CVE-2020-25686, CVE-2020-36109. Chances are one of these is the Nov. 2020 bug.
-->January 2, 2021: Still nothing on the Asus Security Advisory page. But, there is new firmware, version 126.96.36.199.386.41535 dated Dec. 30, 2020. There were many changes in the firmware, but there is no mention of a bug fix. The bug seems to have fallen off the end of the earth. Such are consumer routers.
-->December 17, 2020: Still nothing on the Asus Security Advisory page. No new firmware either.
-->November 22, 2020: Still nothing on the Asus Security Advisory page. No new firmware either.
-->November 13, 2020: There is nothing on the Asus Security Advisory page about this.
Singapore takes the first steps to making routers secure
Singapore tightens security requirements for new home routers
by Eileen Yu of ZDNet October 13, 2020
Starting April 2021, home routers in Singapore will have to have taken some basic security steps in order to be sold. The exact requirements were not clear from the article, but it starts at the very beginning: every router has to have randomized and unique login credentials with an unspecified minimum password strength. And, security patches have to be downloaded automatically. Routers will also have to disable "system services and interfaces that are deemed to be vulnerable" which might refer to WPS and/or UPnP. However, there is nothing about how long security patches have to be issued. The article points out that Japan imposed similar requirements and that the UK is considering this too. The US? Fuggedaboutit. It's the Wild West here, which is why this site is needed.
Tenda routers hacked. The company response tells us not to use their products
New Ttint IoT botnet caught exploiting two zero-days in Tenda routers
by Catalin Cimpanu of ZDNet October 4, 2020
Netlab, the network security division of Qihoo 360, reported that bad guys have been exploiting bugs in Tenda routers to install malware on the routers and to build an IoT botnet. The botnet, called Ttint, was first sighted in November 2019. Not satisfied with the usual, infecting devices to perform DDoS attacks, Ttint also implements 12 different remote access methods to the infected routers, used the routers as proxies to relay traffic, tampered with the router's firewall and DNS settings, and gave attackers the ability to execute remote commands on the hacked devices. Until July 2020, the bad guys exploited bug CVE-2020-10987. Then, Sanjana Sarda, of Independent Security Evaluators, published a detailed report on the vulnerability and four others. A few weeks later Ttint software was revised to exploit a different bug in the same routers. Despite the public shaming, Tenda has fixed neither bug. That's all we need to know. The command control center for the botnet is at notepod2.com, so if you can block this domain in your router or DNS, please do.
Another reason to avoid Netgear hardware
Before you buy that managed Netgear switch, be aware you may need to create a cloud account to use its full UI
by Gareth Corfield of The Register September 21, 2020
Blog about old buggy software in consumer routers
Network routers are just computers
by Daniel Aleksandersen September 12, 2020
A recent study found that one-third of the tested routers shipped with Linux kernel version 2.6.36, which was released in October 2010. This outdated version of the Linux kernel has 233 known security vulnerabilities registered in the Common Vulnerability and Exposures (CVE) database. The study did not look into whether different software services on the router run in sandboxed and constrained environments, or whether they have full privileged access to the system. In Aleksandersen's experience, he has only seen services with full access (bad security). He complains that it is not difficult or time-consuming to set up these protections, but network equipment manufacturers tend not to bother with it. He also replicated a small part of the study at a local electronics shop. He noted every router being sold and checked when they had last received a security update. Not a single router had received a software update in the last 14 months. Manufacturers of consumer routers are not incentivized to provide ongoing support and security updates for their devices. It’s expensive to employ staff that support old products that don’t generate revenue. In his opinion that are no good consumer routers. None. He says you need to switch to more involved, complicated, and expensive enterprise-grade network equipment before you see any improvements. I agree and thus my recommendation here for Peplink products. My page on configuring the Pepwave Surf SOHO should make it easier to get started.
My blog on using two routers
A second router can make working from home much more secure
by Michael Horowitz September 25, 2020
The title is self-explanatory. Last Updated: Oct. 31, 2020.
Do not buy a router from MoFi Network
Critical Vulnerabilities Discovered in MoFi Routers
by Rich Mirch of CriticalStart, Teamares September 2, 2020
I had never heard of Mofi Network until this report came out. They make 4G/LTE routers based on OpenWRT. When Mirch first examined them, he found ten bugs. Mofi fixed some of the bugs, not all, and while doing so introduced still more bugs. Mirch found two (yes two) undocumented administrator accounts (think backdoor). At least one of them lets attackers login to the management interface without a password. The devices also default to enabling remote administration, which no one does any more. Also, no authentication is required to download a support file that contains cleartext credentials and password hashes. One bug that is not fixed, lets bad guys authenticate as root without the root password.
More Cisco bugs
Cisco alert: Four high-severity flaws in routers, switches and AnyConnect VPN for Windows
By Liam Tung of ZDNet August 6, 2020
More high-severity flaws in assorted Cisco software. One bug is in the StarOS system that runs on the ASR 5000 Series Aggregation Services Routers. It allows a remote attacker without credentials to cause a denial of service. Some Small Business switches and Managed switches are also buggy. A remote attacker without credentials can cause a denial of service on the buggy switches. Some vulnerable switches are not being fixed because Cisco considers them too old.
Counterfeit high end networking devices
A Tale of Two Counterfeits
by Steve Gibson of GRC July 21, 2020
Two weeks ago, we learned that C-Data networking devices were spy machines (story below) with all sorts of backdoor accounts. Turns out this was not true, that the devices the researchers had studied were counterfeit. The retraction has been ignored by the tech press, except for Steve Gibson. The other counterfeit he discusses is another recent story, F-Secure found about phony Cisco switches. The Cisco devices were discovered only because they would not boot after a firmware update. Nothing gave away the C-Data devices.
Yet another Cisco flaw
Cisco patches actively exploited ASA/FTD firewall vulnerability
by Sergiu Gatlan of Bleeping Computer July 24, 2020
At this point a severe and actively exploited flaw in Cisco software is not really news. The software this time is the Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software (the OS for standalone appliances, blades, and virtual appliances) and the Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software which should be providing next-gen firewall services. Vulnerability CVE-2020-3452 may allow unauthenticated attackers to read sensitive files on unpatched systems through directory traversal attacks. This happened in the usual way, improper input validation of URLs in HTTP requests. Yawn.
C-Data networking devices are spy machines
Backdoor accounts discovered in 29 FTTH devices from Chinese vendor C-Data
by Catalin Cimpanu for ZDNet July 10, 2020
NOTE: See above. The studied devices were counterfeit.
Researchers Pierre Kim and Alexandre Torres examined networking devices from C-Data and found the worst possible situation. The devices are, technically, not routers, and they are found in the internal networks of ISPs rather than our homes or offices. Earlier research by Pierre Kim can be found on this website in many places. The devices can be thought of as optical modems, they convert optical signals to Ethernet. The firmware in 29 devices from C-Data was found to have 7 vulnerabilities. Even worse, the devices have backdoor accounts, which can grant full access to people that know the hard-coded passwords. This was so obviously done to allow purposeful access/hacking/spying, that the researchers went public with their results rather than tell C-Data first. Much blame also falls on the ISPs that purchased this equipment. For one thing, the boxes only use HTTP for administration not HTTPS. Also, they use Telnet rather than SSH. Both are red flags. The defense against this is a VPN. Using one means that your ISP sees nothing but encrypted bytes.
A study of 127 router models found miserable security
Home router security report
by Peter Weidenbach and Johannes vom Dorp of the Fraunhofer Institute (20 page PDF) July 2020
Researchers at the German Fraunhofer Institute studied 127 common home routers from Asus, AVM, D-Link, Linksys, Netgear, TP-Link and Zyxel. They looked at the latest available firmware as of March 27, 2020. Not one router was bug-free. Some had hundreds of known vulnerabilities. The average number of critical vulnerabilities per router was 53. The best routers had 21 vulnerabilities. A third of the routers use the 2.6.36 Linux kernel which was last updated nine years ago. Routers are not updated very often. 46 routers had not received a security update in the last year. 27 had not been updated in the last two years. In the worst case, there had been no update for 5 years. That said, the report did not go into the concept of End-of-Life where a manufacturer publicly admits there will be no more updates. And, even when routers are updated many known vulnerabilities were not fixed. This is not news, similar prior studies also found this. 50 routers had hard-coded credentials (userid/password) and 16 had well known or easy crackable credentials. Linux provides a number of exploit mitigation features and the routers rarely used them. The same complaint was very recently made by the person that found bugs in 79 Netgear routers (see below). Most firmware has private cryptographic keys so whatever is being secured with a public-private crypto mechanism is not really secure. As for rating the vendors on security, AVM was the best, ASUS and Netgear were mid-tier and the worst were D-Link, Linksys, TP-Link and Zyxel.
Yet another Cisco bug
Cisco SMB kit harbors cross-site scripting bug: One wrong link click... and that's your router pwned remotely
by Shaun Nichols of The Register July 2, 2020
There is a bug in the Cisco Small Business RV042 Dual WAN VPN Router and the Cisco Small Business RV042G Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Router. The bug is in the web interface and is as old as time itself - lazy programming. That's my term, the article attributes the bug to "insufficient validation of user-supplied input". The flaw can be exploited by an unauthenticated remote attacker. The bug is in the web interface so it probably can only be attacked on the LAN side, unless remote admin is enabled. That said, a malicious web page runs on the LAN and can attack the buggy routers from there. The bug was discovered by a company called CyCognito and they said that, in the worst-case scenario, a bad guy could exploit the flaw to take complete control of a vulnerable device. Cisco has issued updated firmware.
Cisco is the only router vendor vulnerable to Ripple20
List of Ripple20 vulnerability advisories, patches, and updates
by Ionut Ilascu of Bleeping Computer June 25, 2020
TCP/IP software from a company called Treck is very buggy. The software is used in millions of IoT devices. And, in Cisco ASR 5000 Series routers. It is also in six other Cisco devices. Why is Cisco is using Treck software?
UPnP yet again
CallStranger - Data Exfiltration & Reflected Amplified TCP DDOS & Port Scan via UPnP SUBSCRIBE Callback
by Yunus Çadirci June 8, 2020
UPnP (Universal Plug and Play) allows devices to find each other on local networks and establish connections to exchange data. Devices communicate on their own without human involvement. UPnP was introduced back in the early 2000s, and it is designed for use on trusted Local Area Networks, thus it has no security at all. Opening up UPnP to the Internet is a mistake, yet a recent Shodan query found over five million devices doing UPnP on the Internet. Some are security cameras, DVRs, printers and, of course, routers. In December 2019, security engineer Yunus Çadirci found a new bug in UPnP. The bug was by design, it was a flaw in the UPnP specification itself. The spec was updated in April 2020. Some implementations of UPnP are buggy, others are not. Miniupnp (after 2011) is not vulnerable to the CallStranger flaw. Older versions of Windows 10 vulnerable, the latest is not. Good luck figuring out which version of UPnP is installed on a device. It is very likely that most vulnerable devices will never have their software updated. If you can run Python, Çadirci created a python script that scans a network for vulnerable devices. Vulnerable devices can be abused to exfiltrate data, scan the Local Area Network or cause a network to participate in a DDoS attack. More specifically, the vulnerability is caused by the Callback header value in the UPnP SUBSCRIBE function. It can be controlled by an attacker.
More proof that ISP DNS should be avoided
TalkTalk customers unable to opt out of ISP's ad-jacking DNS - just like six years ago
by Matthew Hughes of The Register April 20, 2020
When you try to contact a non-existing computer, by name, you should get an error message. Instead, some DNS providers show sponsored ads instead. Not the biggest problem in the world, but worse at TalkTalk where the ability to stop the sponsored ads does not always work. Worse, this prevents some customers from connecting to VPNs. The real solution is not use DNS servers from an ISP. Instead go with Quad9 or Cloudflare or OpenDNS or Google. For more about DNS, see the Test Your DNS page on this site.
Still more fallout from Linksys hack
Linksys asks users to reset passwords after hackers hijacked home routers last month
by Catalin Cimpanu of ZDNet April 16, 2020
Linksys Smart WiFi is a cloud-based system for administering Linksys devices. Recently, Bitdefender detected an organized campaign to break into D-Link and Linksys routers and change the DNS server settings. In response, Linksys has locked all user accounts and is forcing users to reset their passwords. When the password is changed, Linksys will check the DNS server settings and remove the known bad ones. To me, this seems flawed - a bad guy could logon, change the password and then change the DNS servers the next day to some other malicious ones. The one real lesson here is to register your router with the hardware manufacturer.
A different take on the same hacking spree
New Router DNS Hijacking Attacks Abuse Bitbucket to Host Infostealer
by Liviu Arsene of BitDefender March 25, 2020
This seems to be same story as the one below, but many details are different. For one thing, there is no mention of Windows 10 checking for the status of the Internet connection. Instead, it says that a number of popular websites (Amazon Web Services, Disney, Reddit and more) are targeted. And, it only mentions Linksys routers being hacked, nothing about D-Link. Neither article says how the bad guys are getting into the vulnerable routers. This article is from BidDefender and thus the focus is on Windows. So much so, that its no clear if any other OS can be victimized. From their perspective, the use of Bitbucket to deliver malware is interesting, I could care less. It also abuses TinyURL. Yawn. Most victims are in Germany, France, and the United States. As with the article below, the bad DNS servers are 188.8.131.52 and 184.108.40.206. If your router supports outbound firewall rules, it would be good to block these. The malicious web pages reside on 220.127.116.11, 18.104.22.168 and 22.214.171.124. What is not said here is testing a router for open ports (see the Test Your Router page here). Also, any device running a VPN client is immune to this. And, any browser configured to use encrypted DNS is immune to this. Defense is boring.
Hacked routers display scam COVID-19 virus warnings
Hackers Hijack Routers' DNS to Spread Malicious COVID-19 Apps
by Lawrence Abrams of Bleeping Computer March 23, 2020
Yet another case of DNS hijacking. No surprise, the vulnerable routers are from D-Link and Linksys. The malicious DNS servers are 126.96.36.199 and 188.8.131.52. The article fails to mention my DNS Tester page which displays the currently in-effect DNS servers. Windows periodically connects to www.msftconnecttest.com to test whether the Internet connection is functional. Bad guys screwed with the DNS for this domain. When Windows runs a connectivity test, a browser opens to display the scam warning about COVID-19. The article says to configure your router to get DNS servers from your ISP. This is wrong. It is safer to use DNS servers from known trusted sources such as Cloudflare, Quad9, OpenDNS, NextDNS or Google, among others.
Industry wide flaw reported
pppd vulnerable to buffer overflow due to a flaw in EAP packet processing
by CERT Coordination Center - Vulnerability Note VU#782301 March 4, 2020
A new vulnerability that affects many router vendors was reported by Ilja Van Sprundel of IOActive. There are actually two bugs. The first is in the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) packet processing in the Point-to-Point Protocol Daemon (pppd). The bug is an error in how the code validates the size of the input before copying the supplied data into memory. Exploiting the bug allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a stack buffer overflow. The second logic flaw is in the eap_input() function which may not check if EAP has been negotiated during the Line Control Protocol (LCP) phase. This allows an unauthenticated attacker (the worst type of attacker) to send an EAP packet even if ppp refused the authentication negotiation. The vulnerable pppd code in eap_input will mistakenly process the EAP packet and trigger the stack buffer overflow.
Is your router vendor vulnerable? Results are trickling in. OpenWrt is vulnerable and a fix is being worked on. Synology is vulnerable and a fix is being worked on. TP-Link is vulnerable and a fix is being worked on. Ubiquiti Networks has put out an advisory with updated firmware to address this vulnerability. Apple and Draytek are not vulnerable. The worst responses, so far, have been from Asus, Eero, D-Link, Linksys, Netgear and pfSense. They have not said anything.
Thousands of Asus routers hacked
FBI Warned Of Fraudster's Paradise: Up To 130,000 Hacked Asus Routers On Sale For A Few Dollars
by Thomas Brewster of Forbes February 28, 2020
Somewhere between 50,000 and 130,000 Asus routers have been hacked and are being offered for sale alongside personal information on roughly a half million people. Why? Quoting: "The reasons for fraudsters to use such hacked routers are twofold. First, it masks the origin IP address of the fraudster. Second, fraud detection systems will block a transaction if it's taking place outside of the geolocation where the card is normally used. So if a fraudster has access to either a router in a similar location to their victim's typical transactions or their actual router, it's much less likely their illicit purchase will be blocked." The Asus bug dates back to at least 2018 and has been patched, but since Asus firmware updates are a manual process that is miserably explained, few people ever do it.
Wi-Fi bug - No big woof
Flaw in billions of Wi-Fi devices left communications open to eavesdroppng
by Dan Goodin of Ars Technica February 26, 2020
A Wi-Fi vulnerability in chips made by Cypress Semiconductor and Broadcom, allows nearby attackers (within Wi-Fi range) to decrypt some over-the-air data. The good news is that its only a drip of data (several kilobytes) and the vulnerable data is only transmitted immediately after disconnecting from a Wi-Fi network. This is a bug in WPA2, but data transmitted via SSL/TLS still has that encryption going for it. Since very little data is transmitted in plain text, this is not a huge issue. The flaw was discovered by Eset. It affects routers from Asus and Huawei as well as iOS devices, Macs, Amazon Echos, Android devices and more. The flaw is known as Kr00k and billions of devices use the flawed hardware/firmware. The bug was discovered months ago, so many devices have available updates to fix this. However, there is no tester, so there is no way to know if any particular device is buggy or not. The big exception are Apple devices. Interestingly, devices that are not vulnerable become vulnerable if connected to a vulnerable router. Known vulnerable routers: Asus RT-N12, Huawei B612S-25d, Huawei EchoLife HG8245H and Huawei E5577Cs-321. What about the other 14,000 routers? Don't know. Eset said nothing about routers they tested and found were not vulnerable. Chances are other Asus routers are vulnerable. The RT-N12 is old and will probably never be patched. In fact, chances are Asus will never say anything about this. Update: Multiple Cisco products are affected by this.
Windows malware guesses Wi-Fi passwords
One of the most destructive botnets can now spread to nearby Wi-Fi networks
by Dan Goodin of Ars Technica February 11, 2020
Mostly clickbait. The only danger is to Wi-Fi networks that are using a default password. Still, a good reminder about using VLANs. To me, the important point in this article is that the malware phones home to 184.108.40.206 and 220.127.116.11. You really need a router than can block outgoing connections to an IP address.
Ubiquiti UniFi goes to the dark side
You spoke, we didn't listen: Ubiquiti says UniFi routers will beam performance data back to mothership automatically
by Robbie Harb of The Register January 29, 2020
"Ubiquiti Networks is once again under fire for suddenly rewriting its telemetry policy after changing how its UniFi routers collect data without telling anyone." Clearly, the company can no longer be trusted. That said, they are still much better than Synology when it comes to exfiltrating data. The UniFi routers will collect two types of information, PII (personally identifiable information) and other stuff. You can opt out of the PII being sent (collected too?) in the user interface but not the other data. This leads to the question of exactly what type of data falls into each camp. So far, we don't know. The company claims that UniFi owners can stop the collection of "other data" by manually editing a config file. Exactly what file this is, is not clear in this article. Also, the article is just about UniFi, not any of the other lines from Ubiquiti such as AmpliFi, Alien or Edge. However, someone on Reddit said that an upcoming beta release for the EdgeRouter includes "anonymous crash reporting". In November 2019, you could block this phoning home by blocking domain trace.svc.ui.com. It is not clear if that still applies.
Travel Router discussion
The Privacy, Security, & OSINT Show - Episode 153
by Michael Bazzell January 17th, 2020
A discussion of travel routers. The router he settled on is the GL.iNet AR750s Slate and I have a summary of it on the Resources page. I had purchased the same router months before this show aired.
Self promotion masquerading as router attack news
Muhstik Botnet Attacks Tomato Routers to Harvest New IoT Devices
by Cong Zheng, Yang Ji and Asher Davila of Unit42 January 21, 2020
This is the least important router attack I have seen to date. In my opinion, it just self-promotion by Palo Alto Networks. Tomato is an open source alternative firmware for routers. It is not very popular, Unit42 (a division of Palo Alto Networks) found just over 4,600 Tomato routers exposed on the Internet. They also discovered a new variant of the Muhstik botnet that attacks Tomato routers by using the default userid/password to log in to the admin web interface which is on port 8080. Remote administration is off, by default, in Tomato so the number of vulnerable devices can probably be counted on one hand. Muhstik mainly uses infected devices for cryptocurrency mining and DDoS attacks. The usual stuff.
Leave your admin interface's TLS cert and private key in your router firmware in 2020? Just Netgear things
by Shaun Nichols of The Register January 20, 2020
This is not big critical issue. Netgear left a private key embedded in the firmware for their routers, firmware that anyone can download. In theory, a bad guy could use to impersonate the Netgear domain, routerlogin.net, that they tell customers to use to access the router web administration (they also use routerlogin.com). The exact details are not clear in the article, I don't think the author understands the issue. To me, the most important aspect of this occurred when the researchers that found the problem tried to communicate with Netgear. It went badly and there is no excuse for that. None. Also, if you report a Netgear bug, then silence is the rule. Also bad. Good reasons to avoid Netgear devices.
Lots of D-Link router bugs
D-Link Adds More Buggy Router Models to 'Won’t Fix' List
The bugs page has two stories from mid-November about bugs in D-Link routers. About a dozen routers are deemed too old to fix, so there will be no updates. The other story is about the D-Link DIR-878 router which was hacked by seven different groups at a recent hacking contest. D-Link has said nothing about the hacking and we are left to just guess which other D-Link routers have the same bug.
More ISP monitoring of your network coming soon
How does Plume get all these ISP partnerships? Open source software
by Jim Salter of Ars Technica November 12, 2019
Increased monitoring of the network in your home by both your ISP and by Plume is coming. Quoting: "Plume now has partnerships with the first- and second-largest ISPs in the United States, as well as the first- and second-largest in Canada - and also with the National Cable Television Collective (NCTC), a membership organization comprising several hundred independent US cable companies. Earlier this month, we covered the announcement of a Plume partnership with J:COM, Japan's largest ISP ... The real value proposition for ISPs is better support, with faster and cheaper ISP development pipelines. Plume's virtual NOC makes it easy for a support technician to see just what's going on in a customer's network and, therefore, make helpful and accurate assessments about problems. If a customer calls in to complain that their Apple TV, Fire Stick, or Roku keeps buffering, a technician can see at a glance whether the problem is low signal strength or congestion, and they can offer advice accordingly."
Ubiquiti adds telemetry
Sure, we made your Wi-Fi routers phone home with telemetry, says Ubiquiti. What of it?
by Shaun Nichols of The Register November 7, 2019
You didn't ask for it, we didn't tell you about it, but hey, it clears GDPR so what you gonna do? More details on this are on the Secure Routers page. This article adds nothing to what is on the Secure Routers page, but there are 107 comments as I write this. Ubiquiti owners don't know how good they have it compared to Synology owners. In my tests of the RT2600ac router I found that it phoned home all the time, it was none of our business why and you can't stop it.
Old routers, old bugs, new attacks
This aggressive IoT malware is forcing Wi-Fi routers to join its botnet army
by Danny Palmer of ZDNet October 31, 2019
Three old Wi-Fi routers are vulnerable to malware that takes advantage of known vulnerabilities to rope them into a botnet. The malware is a new variant of software that first appeared in 2014, known as Gafgyt. The new variant attacks the Huawei HG532, the Realtek RTL81XX and the Zyxel P660HN-T1A. Vulnerable routers are found by net-wide scans. Interestingly, this latest malware kills any other malware on the router.
Apple adding some smart home features to 3 routers
Why we need Apple's HomeKit-enabled routers
by Jonny Evans of Computerworld October 16, 2019
Back in June 2019, Apple announced upcoming HomeKit-enabled routers from Linksys, Eero and cable company Spectrum. Seems like a big nothing to me. The Pepwave Surf SOHO can do anything that needs to be done in terms of isolating devices in your home. Apple software will have three options: Restrict to Home, Automatic, and No Restrictions.
EoL lists for router manufacturers
Is Your Old Router Still Getting Security Updates?
by Chris Hoffman of How-To Geek October 12, 2019
Router manufacturers are not forced to update router for any particular amount of time. And, since many compete on price and people buy the cheapest possible routers, the manufacturers have to cut corners somewhere and long-term support is an easy place to cut. After all, how many people will buy a router because the manufacturer promises extended security updates? So how do you tell if your router is still supported? Check the router manufacturer's website. The article has links to End-of-Life lists for eight router vendors. As a reader commented, however, it does not address the many people who use a router provided by their ISP.
Routers still buggy after all these years
SOHOpelessly Broken 2.0
by Independent Security Evaluators September 16, 2019
In 2013 ISE first researched routers and IoT devices and found many bugs and flaws. Now, in 2019, things are no better. They discovered 125 security vulnerabilities across 13 routers and NAS devices. Or, as they would put it: Security controls put in place by device manufacturers are insufficient against attacks carried out by remote adversaries. Vendors tested: Buffalo, Synology, TerraMaster, Zyxel, Drobo, ASUS, Asustor, Seagate, QNAP, Lenovo, Netgear, Xiaomi and Zioncom (TOTOLINK). All 13 devices had at least one vulnerability that could be leveraged by an attacker to get remote access to the device's shell or administrative panel. They obtained root shells on 12 of the 13 devices, allowing them complete control. Six devices were as bad as bad gets: they could be remotely exploited without authentication. One of these was the Netgear Nighthawk R9000. The ASUS RT-AC3200 router had three types of bugs. This was also a test of the companies, just as much as their software. These companies never responded to ISE: Drobo, Buffalo Americas, and Zioncom Holdings.
Yet another LAN side protocol available on WAN is being abused
Yikes! Another DDoS Weapon, WS-Discovery Amplification Attacks
by A10 Networks September 2019
What I have to say, is on the Bugs page as these devices should not be exposed on the Internet.
The Wi-Fi networks at WeWork have bad security
WeWork's laughably weak Wi-Fi password is downright dangerous
by Sean Captain of Fast Company August 21, 2019
WeWork is not even trying when it comes to their Wi-Fi security. The password they use is one of the worst anyone could possibly choose. And, yes, I said the password because they use the same one at multiple locations. The article also dinged them for using WPA2 Personal, which is not really fair. If the password was complex and rotated, this would be fine. That said, if they cared, they would use WPA2 Enterprise rather than WPA2 Personal. Turns out they do care, about making money. The bad Wi-Fi security is used as a lure to sell customers better security for more money. Not mentioned here is that routers can also isolate users from each other, a security feature hardly anyone uses and one that works with WPA2 Personal. Also not mentioned is the DNS environment at WeWork. These things don't come up, typically because the people writing these stories are Art History majors and not familiar with the technology.
Router and IoT firmware still not secure
Huge Survey of Firmware Finds No Security Gains in 15 Years
by Paul Roberts of Security Ledger August 14, 2019
A study of thousands of device firmwares showed that the security is terrible and has not improved over the last 15 years. The report is from Cyber Independent Testing Lab (CITL), a non-profit organization that conducts independent tests of software security. Their Chief Scientist, Sarah Zatko said "Nobody is trying ... We found no consistency in a vendor or product line doing better or showing improvement. There was no evidence that anybody is making a concerted effort to address the safety hygiene of their products". CITL examined firmware from 18 vendors including ASUS, D-link, Linksys, NETGEAR, Buffalo, Belkin, TP-Link, QNAP, Ubiquiti and others. They did not look at the stuff on my Security Checklist page. Instead they looked a the use of non-executable stacks, Address Space Layout Randomization and stack guards (which prevent buffer overflow attacks). As an example, the ASUS RT-AC55U used none of these security features.
New VPN feature added to AmpliFi
Secure networking is now available to all AmpliFi users anywhere in the world with the AmpliFi Teleport App
by AmpliFi August 15, 2019
My thoughts on this are on the Mesh Routers page.
Consumer Reports does a poor review of 29 routers
Many Wireless Routers Lack Basic Security Protections, Consumer Reports' Testing Finds
by Nicholas De Leon of Consumer Reports August 6, 2019
It seems that no matter what computer related topic they cover, Consumer Reports does a poor job. This review of 29 routers is amateurish and, in large part, a waste of time. The advice offered for making any router more secure is less than the short list on the home page of this site. And, no mention of this site? This article does not have the individual router ratings, but I have seen them and they are mostly useless. There is no link here so as not to encourage anyone to read this article. I am working on a long rebuttal. My initial rebuttal is on the Secure Routers page.
Router botnet detected in the Philippines and Thailand
Don't let the crooks 'borrow' your home router as a hacking server
by Paul Ducklin of Sophos August 7, 2019
SSH (Secure Shell) is the probably the most common program for remotely accessing computers. Your router may be running an SSH server for administrative purposes; perhaps so that your ISP can get into it and make changes. There are multiple ways that bad guys can abuse an SSH server and make money off it. Netlab 360 recently found several hundred Fibrehome routers, model AN5506, in Thailand and the Philippines infected with malware. The malware installed an SSH server on the routers, one that listens on the non-standard port 23455. This appears to be a zombie network of SSH tunnels that the bad guys are holding on to as ready-to-use proxies.
Opting out of Comcast public Wi-Fi in your home
Comcast Xfinity is Using your Router as a Wifi Hotspot, at your Expense. Here’s how to Opt Out.
by G.E. Miller of 20 Something Finance August 1, 2019
Quoting: "Not only are you paying an outrageous $13 per month ($156 per year) ... to lease a sub-par modem, but Comcast is then using that very same modem that you are being overcharged for to provide the revenue-generating Xfinity WiFi service to other customers ... Disabling or opting your modem out of the Comcast Xfinity public wifi hotspot network is fairly simple on the surface, but there have been reports of customers running into issues, and you may have to periodically re-opt-out. Go here to manage your preferences and 'turn off' ..."
Disney's Circle Internet filtering reviewed
Can Disney’s Circle really deliver a porn-free Internet?
by Jim Salter of Ars Technica July 21, 2019
Not directly a router story, but close. Circle is available both as a standalone device or a service embedded in some Netgear routers. This article reviewed the first generation stand-alone device, a second gen model was recently released. Salter much preferred it inside the router. While he felt that Circle's filtering is best of breed, it does have some quirks and it is easier to escape a kids safe sandbox than it should be. Circle judges websites as either all good or all bad. This can be problem when you allow sites that contain both innocent and explicit content (e.g. Reddit, Flickr, Imgur). The external device intercepts all traffic using ARP spoofing. The upside is that it connects to a router the same way every other device does (Ethernet or WiFi). The downside is speed, it slows things down. Some high end switches and routers detect this as an attack and block the Circle device. A reader comment mentioned that it can block all new devices, by default.
Still more DNS server hijacking on Brazilian routers
Brazil is at the forefront of a new type of router attack
By Catalin Cimpanu of ZDNet July 12, 2019
Avast reported that more than 180,000 routers in Brazil had their DNS settings changed in the first half of 2019. Basically, look at a webpage and your router gets hacked (assuming it has a default password). Malicious DNS servers send victims to scam websites with real names. Or, they replace legitimate ads with ads that are malicious or with ads that make the bad guys money. Multiple groups are doing this. Needless to say, no article on the subject mentioned my Test Your DNS page which is like missing the elephant in the room. Sad.
Yet another Cisco screw-up
Huawei cryptographic keys embedded in Cisco’s firmware
by SEC Technologies No date
OK, the mistake is in software that runs on switches rather than routers, but close enough. Cisco firmware was found to contain digital certificates and keys belonging to Futurewei Technologies, a US-based R&D arm of Huawei. Yes, Huawei. Turns out Cisco was using a Huawei-made open-source package during testing and forgot to remove it before rolling out the software to the world. Oops. In fairness, this was not a threat to Cisco clients. On the other hand, based on feedback from SEC Technologies, Cisco also removed some unnecessary software and updated third party software, included in their firmware, that had multiple vulnerabilities. Of course, Cisco will focus on the oversight that caused no immediate threat and they not say anything about shipping software with known vulnerabilities. In part, this is a plug for an IoT Inspector service from SEC Technologies. It seems to work.
D-Link agrees to do good stuff
D-Link must suffer indignity of security audits to settle with the Federal Trade Commission
by Max Smolaks of The Register July 3, 2019
Back in January 2017, the FTC accused D-Link of a long list of shoddy security practices, including, non-removable default passwords in IP cameras, command-injection flaws, leaked router security keys and plain-text password storage in its mobile app. The case was finally settled with D-Link agreeing to do good stuff. They will submit to security audits every two years for the next decade. They pledged to take security seriously for the next 20 years. Of course, they admitted no guilt. Two things stood out to me. First, they agreed to automatic firmware updates. Second, they will tell customers when their routers are no longer getting bug fixes. Quoting from the agreement: At least 60 days prior to ceasing security updates for a Covered Device, a clear and conspicuous notice to consumers who registered their Covered Device, through the communication channel(s) the consumer chose at the time of registration, and a clear and conspicuous notice on the product information page of the Covered Device on Defendant’s website that the Covered Device will no longer receive firmware updates..
Apple HomeKit will integrate with some routers
Apple breathes new life into HomeKit with a focus on privacy and security
by Kevin C. Tofel June 5, 2019
The Apple smart home system, HomeKit, will add support for routers from Linksys, Eero and Spectrum. We don't yet know exactly what this means, there are no specifics. The concept is that smart home devices will be isolated from seeing the full home network (LAN). None of the articles about this mentioned that you can already isolate devices using a Guest Wi-Fi network. For more about isolating devices into Virtual LANs, see the VLAN page right here.
I ran a test
Barbarians at the gate - Attacks/Probes of a router
by me May 28, 2019
For a day, I left my router open to incoming connections looking for Microsoft Remote Desktop. There were 62 attacks/probes looking for a Windows machine to remotely control. The probes came from 20 different countries and from 7 different states in the US. One service, one day. Router security matters.
An unspecified brand of routers is being hacked to install malware on PCs
Hackers abuse ASUS cloud service to install backdoor on users' PCs
by Dan Goodin of Ars Technica May 16, 2019
According to Eset, bad guys are abusing an ASUS self-update mechanism for their WebStorage software to install Windows malware. Eset believes (but can't be 100% sure) that the attacks are the result of router based man-in-the-middle interception that exploits HTTP connections to ASUS servers. Of course, the HTTP is on Asus, not the router. Also on Asus is incomplete code-signing to validate the authenticity of downloaded files. Eset found that most of the organizations that were hacked were using routers made by the same manufacturer, which they declined to identify. The routers have their web admin interface exposed to the Internet, security mistake number 7 on the short list on the home page of this site. Get a Chromebook.
A new take on Router Security
Airbnb host thrown in the clink after guest finds hidden camera inside Wi-Fi router
by Kieren McCarthy of The Register May 8, 2019
I did not see this coming. A router in an Airbnb in China was found to have a peephole drilled into the front of it, right next to the LEDs that indicate Ethernet activity. The hole looked very much like the Ethernet LEDs. Blending in with the crowd. The hole was connected to a camera that was inside the router.
Still another Critical Cisco bug
Sinister secret backdoor found in networking gear perfect for government espionage: The Chinese are – oh no, wait, it's Cisco again
by Iain Thomson of The Register May 2, 2019
This bug is as bad as bad gets. An unauthenticated, remote bad guy can connect to the buggy devices as the root user. The NSA must have loved this one. The issue is a default SSH key pair. Bad guys only need to open an SSH connection via IPv6 to a vulnerable device using the SSH key pair to get root access to the system. In summary: BACKDOOR. BACKDOOR. BACKDOOR. This was discovered and reported by Oliver Matula of ERNW Enno Rey Netzwerke. Be sure to scroll down this page for other brutal flaws in Cisco software. Cisco also fixed 22 high severity bugs and 18 considered medium severity. Seem like lots of bugs to you?
Me on using a router to defend against IoT and Windows 10
Why I like my router
by Michael Horowitz April 26, 2019
Tracing network activity to see if you have a vulnerable IoT device. Blocking vulnerable and insecure IoT devices. Defending against Windows 10 spying with DNS.
DNS changing attacks on consumer routers
Ongoing DNS hijackings target Gmail, PayPal, Netflix, banks and more
by Dan Goodin of Ars Technica April 5, 2019
As long there are consumer routers that don't self-update or have been abandoned (no more bug fixes) this hardly qualifies as news. That said, yet again, bugs in consumer routers are being exploited to configure the routers with malicious DNS servers. As always, the malicious DNS servers send victims to scam copies of real websites. For some reason, the fact that the malicious DNS servers, in this case, were hosted by Google seems noteworthy. It is not. Most of the buggy routers are from D-Link, again, not news. They are the D-Link DSL-2640B, DSL-2740R, DSL-2780B, DSL-526B and 260E. In addition, some routers from Secutech and TOTOLINK were attacked. The true disgrace here is the reporting about this from people that do not really understand the topic. As a result, the defensive measures offered by Ars Technica and ZDNet are, to be kind, sub-optimal. Looking for Extended Validation certificates, for example, is not mentioned. Heck, the scam sites in this case are particularly low rent, served over HTTP, so just looking for DV certificate would be sufficient defense. And, I have a list here of many websites that report on your DNS servers. Using them avoids the need to log in to the router which too many people are unable to do. And trusting router vendors to fix flaws, the knee jerk reaction, is being unjustifiably optimistic. In Google's case it is shifting blame too.
Excellent router security article
TP-Link router zero-day that offers your network up to hackers
by Paul Ducklin of Sophos April 2, 2019
An excellent article about router security. As the title suggests, the focus of the article is the recently disclosed flaw in a TP-Link router, but the article is a worthwhile read for everyone as it includes a defensive strategy against ISP supplied devices. And, it is another example of a consumer router company not caring about security.
Huawei clearly does not care about router security
Huawei bungled router security, leaving kit open to botnets, despite alert from ISP years prior
by Gareth Corfield of The Register March 28, 2019
This is something we have seen before from router vendors. Huawei routers had a known bug and the company fixed the bug in some of their routers but not all of them. Do the least amount of work possible to make the spotlight go away. An ISP told Huawei about a trivially exploitable remote code execution flaw back in 2013. The bug meant that the HG523a and HG533 routers/gateways could be hijacked by bad guys. Huawei fixed the vulnerability sometime in 2014. However, other Huawei devices in the HG series, suffered from the same flaw and remained vulnerable for years. The bug, in UPnP, was discovered, yet again, years later. Again, a patch was issued. This article leaves out an important point. The bug in the UPnP software is only half the story. That UPnP is exposed to the Internet, is actually a larger flaw. This too, goes back to 2013.
Cisco yet again, again
On March 27, 2019, German security firm RedTeam Pentesting issued three advisories about bugs in the Cisco RV320 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Router. The biggest severity is to Cisco's reputation. These bugs were initially identified in September 2018, and the first three advisories about them were released Jan. 23, 2019. Cisco issued fixes, but, the fixes were flawed. These routers were reported being attacked in January 2019 - there is a summary of this below on this page.
Talos finds 11 flaws in Cujo not-so smart firewall
Vulnerability Spotlight: Multiple Vulnerabilities in CUJO Smart Firewall, Das U-Boot, OCTEON SDK, Webroot BrightCloud
by Cisco Talos March 19, 2019
Cujo sits between your router and modem (logically or physically) and offers security protection (but no privacy protection). The device contains 11 bugs. In the worst case, the bugs could allow attackers to take complete and permanent control of the Cujo. All the bugs have been fixed and Cujo should auto-update. The Cujo website says nothing about this. Consider that when deciding whether to trust them.
Router advice from Readers Digest is just as bad as you would expect
This Is How Often You Should Be Rebooting Your Router
by Erin Kayata of Readers Digest no date
Really? Router advice from Readers Digest? On the upside, it's not all bad. Re-booting a router can't hurt and, as the article says, its a good thing to do when there are problems. Also, there is some malware on routers that is removed by rebooting. But, an expert claims rebooting will fix slow Wi-Fi. Things go further downhill with the author claiming that regularly turning a router on and off makes for "a faster connection." And, if witches are haunting the router, rebooting gets rid of them (just joking). The article says that rebooting can "prevent yourself from being hacked" which is not true. The ultimate heap of baloney is this: "According to Consumer Reports, your Internet provider assigns a temporary IP address to each of your devices which can change at any time. If your router doesn’t catch the change, your connection can become slow." My joke about haunted witches is closer to the truth.
Another company buying router bugs
As Phones Get Harder to Hack, Zero Day Vendors Hunt for Router Exploits
by Joseph Cox of Motherboard March 7, 2019
Obtaining vulnerabilities for mobile phones is getting harder, so companies that sell exploits are increasingly looking for attacks that target routers instead. The article is mostly about Crowdfense which buys zero day exploits from researchers and sells them to government agencies. They are now offering a total of $15 million to hackers with exploits for sale which includes up to $100,000 for router attacks. Zerodium does the same thing, see the January 2019 section below.
Cisco yet again
Management Interfaces in Three Models of Cisco Networking Devices Are Vulnerable to RCE Attacks
by Ryan Seguin of Tenable February 27, 2019
This is as bad as bad gets. Quoting: "Cisco has released a security advisory for CVE-2019-1663, a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability present in the remote management interface on certain router and firewall devices, the RV110W, RV130W, and RV215W. The vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code through malicious HTTP requests." Patches have been released. To be remotely hacked the routers must have remote administration enabled and it is disabled by default. The bug is critical, yet it was first discovered October 25, 2018. The delay in issuing a fix strikes me as much too long. These are old devices. For example, the RV215W was reviewed by PC Magazine in January 2013 and the review noted it did not have gigabit Ethernet and Wi-Fi was only on the 2.4 GHz band.
Two buggy Cisco routers are being attacked
Hackers are going after Cisco RV320/RV325 routers using a new exploit
by Catalin Cimpanu of ZDNet January 27, 2019
Bad guys are trying to exploit two just-patched flaws in two Cisco routers. The patches were released on January 23, 3019. Proof of concept code to exploit the bugs was released the next day. The day after that, the attacks started. The first flaw (CVE-2019-1653) lets an attacker get device configuration details without a password. The flaws exist on both the LAN and WAN side. The second bug (CVE-2019-1652) allows an attacker to run admin commands on the device, again without a password. Here too, the articles I read did not say if this bug is LAN or WAN side, or both. It is estimated there are 6,247 vulnerable Cisco RV320 routers, and 3,410 vulnerable Cisco RV325 routers. The vast majority of them are on the networks of US based ISPs. More information about the bugs is on the Bugs page. The RV320 was first released in June 2013. It now sells for about $140. It is dual WAN and supports SSL, PPTP and IPSec VPNs. No Wi-Fi. The true takeaway, for me, is whether Cisco is a trustworthy router vendor. Earlier this month, there was this story: Cisco warns: Patch now or risk your security appliance choking on single rogue email and they seem to have lots of bugs: Cisco Security Advisories and Alerts.
Japanese government to do some hacking
Japanese government plans to hack into citizens' IoT devices
by Catalin Cimpanu of ZDNet January 27, 2019
Me: The article starts in the middle, not the beginning. On a secure network, the IoT devices can not be accessed from the Internet. While IoT devices need to make outgoing connections, they should not be allowed to accept unsolicited incoming connections from every bad guy in the world.
Article summary: The Japanese government has authorized its employees to hack into IoT devices in Japan find insecure ones. They will start looking for routers with default passwords and common passwords. The Japanese are worried about the Summer Olympics in Tokyo 2020, specifically that hackers might abuse IoT devices to launch attacks against the Olympics.
Me: This is a good thing to do, but it will not protect the Olympics - attacks can be launched from anywhere. You can test your our own router using the many tests on my Router Tester page. You can also see what the outside world has found on your public IP address on my Shodan page.
Clickbait from Wired
Your old router is an absolute goldmine for troublesome hackers
by Amit Katwala of Wired UK January 14, 2019
I consider this article is clickbait, not because of any exaggerations or lies, but because of its focus on the bad stuff. Hair on fire and all that. It omits defensive steps people can take, steps that are the sole reason for this website. In fact, it omits me, after I was interviewed by email by the author. And, great editing: "ISPs could be doing more to educate, for example by regular email bulletins to provide guidance and firmware updates, but that could potentially users them vulnerable to phishing scams." All that said, things are indeed bad.
Maybe avoid router brands targeted by Zerodium?
How to Sell Your 0day Exploit to ZERODIUM
Quoting: "ZERODIUM is the leading exploit acquisition platform for premium zero-days and advanced cybersecurity capabilities. We pay BIG bounties to security researchers to acquire their original and previously unreported zero-day research ... at ZERODIUM we focus on high-risk vulnerabilities with fully functional exploits and we pay the highest rewards (up to $2,000,000 per submission)." They pay for bugs in these brands of routers: ASUS, Cisco, D-Link, Huawei, Linksys, MikroTik, Netgear, TP-Link, and Ubiquiti. Perhaps, using a different brand makes you safer? It is always better to be a lesser target.
Spectrum/Charter to start using Cujo in 2019
Charter Communications Goes With CUJO AI For Customer Security and Privacy
by Julio Urquidi January 8, 2019
There is, as yet, no meat on the bones of this story. Still, a Spectrum executive said it will provide "... Spectrum Internet customers advanced security, privacy and additional control over their in-home networks..." Being lied to is commonplace, so no surprise, that it will reduce privacy not increase it. And, customers have all the control they could possibly want as things stand since Spectrum lets you replace all their hardware with your own. Even using their hardware, they do not (as far as I know) prevent customers from making configuration changes to the router/gateway they provide. My brief take on Cujo is on the Resources Page.
Avast report says the worst router attacks are still to come
Hacking attacks on your router: Why the worst is yet to come
by Danny Palmer of ZDNet January 3, 2019
Avast issued a report with predictions for 2019 and this article summarizes the router section. Quoting: "Cyber criminals are only scratching the surface when it comes to exploiting vulnerabilities in routers ... and the worst is yet to come, with attackers set to use compromised devices for a wider variety of malicious activities." Some reasons why: VPNfilter was real bad. People don't update router firmware. People ignore routers and won't know if theirs gets hacked. Poor passwords and default passwords. Malware source code has leaked so anyone can use it. The defensive advice offered by the FBI is lame.
Exposed router ports attacked yet again
Hacker Streaming PewDiePie Videos on Exposed Chromecast Devices
by Lawrence Abrams of Bleeping Computer January 2, 2019
A new hacking campaign is targeting Chromecast adapters, Smart TVs, and Google Home. At the moment, the attackers are merely playing a video urging victims to subscribe to a YouTube channel. Pretty harmless. However, the attacks could turn mean very easily. According to a website the attackers created, they can remotely play media on your device, rename your device, factory reset it, reboot it, force it to forget all wifi networks, force it to pair to a new Bluetooth speaker/wifi point. In addition, exposed devices leak information: the current WI-Fi network name, saved Wi-Fi networks, the bluetooth devices an exposed device has paired with, the alarms that are set, and much more. The hackers claim they were able to retrieve approximately 123,000 vulnerable devices using Shodan, with 100,000 actually being accessible. The exposed TCP ports are 8008, 8009, and 8443, which are normally used for management functions.
Brutal bug in Orange routers reveals Wi-Fi passwords to anyone
Over 19,000 Orange modems are leaking WiFi credentials
By Catalin Cimpanu of ZDNet December 24,2018
Nearly 19,500 Orange Livebox ADSL gateways are leaking their WiFi SSID and password to a remote unauthenticated users. An attacker is exploiting a vulnerability (CVE-2018-20377) that was first described in 2012. Yes, 2012. All the bad guys have to do is request the URL get_getnetworkconf.cgi. What a disgrace. Most of the vulnerable devices are assigned to customers in France and Spain.
Netgear router fails to find updated firmware
Security Now Podcast Episode 694
by Steve Gibson of grc.com December 18, 2018
Gibson read a letter from a listener who was having poor Wi-Fi performance on a Netgear router. The router said the installed firmware was the latest, but eventually, the listener checked the Netgear website and, sure enough, there was updated firmware. Installing the update restored the Wi-Fi performance. The question this raises, is whether the router was infected with malware which blocked it from reporting newer firmware. Had the listener read the Ongoing Care and Feeding section on the home page of this site, he would have rebooted the router periodically just for good luck. Rebooting clears up many malware infections.
A very different take on router security
A look at home routers, and a surprising bug in Linux/MIPS
by Parker Thompson, Sarah Zatko, Mudge Zatko of Cyber Independent Testing Lab December 7, 2018
Quoting: "At Cyber-ITL, our mission is to empower consumers to protect themselves by reporting on the security of popular products. We reviewed 28 popular home routers for basic hardening features. None performed well ... We analyzed the firmware images of 28 popular home routers, checking for basic code hygiene and software safety features. What we found was disappointing: none of the routers made consistent use of basic software safety features like ASLR, stack guards, and DEP - features which have been standard in desktop environments for over 15 years ... These findings suggest an industry-wide failure to audit and test the security of the software running on these products. Indeed, our review shows that even the most basic practices are being largely ignored. The absence of these security features is inexcusable: the features discussed in this report are easy to adopt, come with no downsides ... while none of the routers we reviewed scored well, the Linksys WRT32x scored the best ... there is little consistency in terms of security practices even within the models of the same brand ... this poor showing implies an apathetic attitude towards applied consumer safety and security..." It is not clear to me just how important these features are. As I understand them, they defend the OS from attack by malware. However, a router is not a general purpose OS. The only software running on the router is software provided by the hardware manufacturer. No one runs a web browser on their router.
Yet another way to abuse UPnP
Hackers are opening SMB ports on routers so they can infect PCs with NSA malware
by Catalin Cimpanu of ZDNet November 28, 2018
UPnP has been a problem for routers for years. It is one of the first things that should be disabled. UPnP was only meant to be used on a Local Area Network but the morons that program many routers exposed it on the Internet. Its like a doctor operating on the wrong leg. Routers that expose UPnP to the Internet have been abused time and time again. In this latest twist, bad guys are re-configuring the router to allow them access to shared folders on a victim's network. They are attacking and abusing Windows file sharing that runs on TCP ports 139 and 445 (among others). Akamai detected this malware campaign and they call it EternalSilence. They report that of the 277,000 routers with vulnerable UPnP services exposed online, 45,113 have been compromised this way. As if copying all the shared files wasn't enough, by exploiting assorted bugs, this type of access can also infect both Windows and Linux computers with malware. Akamai said "Administrators will have problems detecting the malicious NAT injections, as there is no administrative visibility into them on an injected router." I have my doubts about that as I have seen routers expose this type of information. They also say: "The best way to identify if a device is vulnerable or actively being leveraged for UPnProxying is to scan an end-point and audit it's NAT table entries," but it is not clear if this scanning is done from the LAN side or the WAN side. Frankly, the suggested defensive steps from Akamai are useless. And neither the ZDNet, Register or Ars articles add anything of value. Port forwarding requires knowledge of the LAN side subnet. It is not clear if the bad guys can learn this from the router or if they merely guess at default values.
Germany weighs in on Router Security
Germany pushes router security rules, OpenWRT and CCC push back
by Richard Chirgwin of The Register November 20, 2018
"Last week, in a attempt to address broadband router security, the German government published its suggestions for minimum standards – and came under immediate criticism that its proposals didn't go far enough." The rules are guidelines for manufacturers, they are not enforceable laws. This site has guidelines for everyone else. Vendors that adhere to the guidelines can indicate this with a sticker on their routers. The German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), said the guidelines were the result of consultations with vendors, network operators, and consumer advocates. Hard to imagine more of a consumer advocate for router security than me. I was not contacted. Among their suggestions that are slightly off the beaten path: Guest Wi-Fi networks should not have access to device configuration, factory resets should put the router into a secure state, and all personal data should be deleted during a factory reset. The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) and OpenWrt both felt the guidelines did not go far enough and demanded that: "Vendors have to inform customer before buying the product for all devices being sold in Germany, how long the device will get security updates in case problems are found" and "the customer must have the possibility to install custom software on their devices..." There will always be some disagreement, but this is a first step, one that no other country has taken.
Let us not forget bad D-Link security
Uncle Sam, D-Link told to battle in court over claims of shoddy device security: Judge snubs summary judgment bids
by Richard Chirgwin of The Register November 6, 2018
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a lawsuit against D-Link in January 2017 complaining of assorted bad security practices, including hard-coded passwords, command-injection vulnerabilities, misplaced security keys, and plaintext password storage. They claim there was misrepresentation because D-Link touted the advanced security of its products. More below. The legal battle is going to trial on January 14, 2019.
A large router botnet thanks to a 5 year old bug
IoT botnet infects 100,000 routers to send Hotmail, Outlook, and Yahoo spam
by Catalin Cimpanu for ZDNet November 7, 2018
The past two months have seen the rise of the new BCMUPnP_Hunter botnet composed of roughly 100,000 home routers. Analyzed by the Netlab team at Qihoo 360, the botnet exploits a five-year-old bug in the Broadcom UPnP SDK which is embedded in thousands of router models from multiple vendors. The vulnerability is as bad as bad gets, a remote un-authenticated attacker can execute malicious code the router. The botnet scans for routers with an exposed UPnP interface on port 5431. The botnet is sophisticated and newly programmed by someone quite good at their craft. Infected routers both send SPAM and function as proxy nodes to hide the location of the bad guys.
Routers hacked in Poland to send SMS messages
The camera makes fun of the SMS bill
by CERT Orange Polska October 31, 2018
Assorted devices, including routers, that use SIM cards for Internet access were hacked to send SMS messages to foreign countries, earning the bad guys money from the SMS termination. Some hacked devices were: D-Link DWR-921 4G LTE routers, Teltonika RUT240 industrial routers, Dahua CCTV devices (disputed) and Digi modems. It is thought that the devices were vulnerable because of default passwords. The D-Link DWR-921 router also has a known Directory Traversal bug that lets attackers download a configuration file with a unencrypted passwords. This router will not be fixed by D-Link and it suggested to throw them away. Both articles are in Polish but Chrome translation is good enough to get the gist.
Hacker takes pity on MikroTik routers
A mysterious grey-hat is patching people's outdated MikroTik routers
by Catalin Cimpanu of ZDNet October 12, 2018
In fairness to MikroTik they have been patching reported bugs quickly. However, its no surprise, that their customers do not install the patches. A lone person has taken pity on unpatched MikroTik routers and is patching them so they can not be abused by bad guys. Using the name Alexey, this person has bragged about this on a Russian blogging platform. He adds firewall rules that block access to the router. On this site, the Test Your Router page links to many online services that test your router for open TCP/IP ports. The same for the Shodan page. The worst bug (CVE-2018-14847) was patched in April 2018. It lets a bad guy download the user database file. Once decrypted, this gives bad guys access to the username/password to log in remotely. Alexey claims to have patched over 100,000 MikroTik routers. To put this in perspective, there are over two million MikroTik routers in use and over 420,000 show signs of infection. Bad guys who are installing malware on these routers are not closing WAN side ports, so they can still be modfiied.
Xiongmai video surveillance devices are extremely insecure
Using a router to defend against Xiongmai video devices
by Michael Horowitz (me) October 10, 2018
OK, the Xiongmai devices in question are not routers. But, they are so terribly insecure that security firm SEC Consult recommends throwing them in the trash. In contrast, I suggest a number of ways to isolate them while continuing to use them despite their many security issues. My suggestions can apply not just to Xiongmai devices but to all insecure IoT devices.
MikroTik devices must be patched
October 7, 2018: RouterOS from MikroTik was patched with the latest bug fixes at the end of August and in September (they maintain different branches of their firmware). Four bugs that were just patched were found by Jacob Baines of Tenable Research. And, a bug that was patched back in April 2018 was much more serious than previously believed. Only 30% of MikroTik devices have been patched. Details are on the Bugs page. New attacks will surely follow.
Netgear sent me an email message, informing me of the availability of new firmware for the EX3800 range extender. The email included a link to How do I upgrade firmware on my NETGEAR WiFi Range Extender? Well done.
GhostDNS, yet another DNS changing router attack
70+ different types of home routers(all together 100,000+) are being hijacked by GhostDNS
by Netlab 360 September 29, 2018
Starting September 20, 2018, Netlab noticed an existing malware campaign ramp up its attacks with new scanners. Radware blogged about this campaign back in August (2018), but Netlab says it goes back even further. They call it GhostDNS and it now attacks more than 70 different routers. They have seen it infect over 100,000 routers, so far. Malicious DNS servers are used to send victims to fake/scam versions of websites. Rather than using a similar domain name (citibank.edu instead of citibank.com) users deal with the real domain name but are directed to a scam site nonetheless. They have observed GhostDNS targeting at least 52 domains so far, including major banks, telcos, ISPs, media outlets, Avira and Netflix. The GhostDNS malware campaign consists of: Shell DNSChanger, Js DNSChanger, PyPhp DNSChanger, a Phishing Web System, a Web Admin System and a Rogue DNS System. There are over 100 attack scripts. Routers are attacked from both sides, from the WAN and from the LAN. 88% of infected routers are in Brazil. Some companies making vulnerable routers are D-Link, Tenda, TP-Link, Roteador and (of course) MikroTik. The full list of known vulnerable routers is in the blog posting. Netlab 360 has been working to take components of GhostDNS off-line. The best defense against all types of DNS attacks is to be familiar with and look for indications that a website uses Extended Validation.
A sophisticated botnet with no obvious purpose
Torii botnet - Not another Mirai variant
by the Avast Threat Intelligence Team September 27, 2018
The Telnet honeypot of security researcher Vess On Security was attacked by a new botnet coming from Tor exit nodes. Hard to imagine that devices still leave themselves exposed to Telnet. The malware contains unprecedented levels of sophistication, yet it has has no obvious purpose. It can exfiltrate data in quite a few different ways and supports multiple layers of encrypted communication. While it phones home on TCP port 443, this is deceptive because it does not use TLS. While most IoT malware is flushed when the device reboots, Torii uses six different methods to maintain persistence. The malware is modular in design and can infect devices running MIPS, ARM, x86, x64, PowerPC, and SuperH, among others.
Still more about VPNfilter
Researchers find Russian VPNfilter malware was a Swiss Army hacking knife
by Sean Gallagher of Ars Technica September 26, 2018
Reminder of old news: VPNfilter had been detected on a half million routers in 54 countries. And, it is the rare malware that survives a reboot of the router.
New news: The VPNfilter router malware is worse than originally thought. New features were discovered that exploit the entire network connected to the infected router. Run for the hills. Or, better yet, run away from consumer grade routers. The newly discovered features are: inspect and redirect HTTP traffic passing through the router, SSH client, SSH server, file transfers using the SCP protocol, nmap port scanner, network reconnaissance from the hacked router, scan for Mikrotik devices, a firewall, port forwarding to an outside network, a SOCKS5 virtual private network proxy server that runs on TCP port 5380, a Reverse-TCP VPN that connects the hacked router to the bad guys over a VPN (used to both steal data and for remote command and control). Quoting: "VPNfilter was clearly built for long-term use as a network exploitation and attack platform." Keep in mind, that this is, in part, an advertisement for Talos themselves. These quotes illustrate my point:
"The sophistication of VPNFilter drives home the point that this is a framework that all individuals and organizations should be tracking. Only an advanced and organized defense can combat these kinds of threats, and at the scale that VPNFilter is at, we cannot afford to overlook these new discoveries."
"The sophisticated nature of this framework further illustrates the advanced capabilities of the threat actors making use of it, as well as the need for organizations to deploy robust defensive architectures to combat threats such as VPNFilter."
Also proving my point is that the blogs from Talos are very short on defensive measures. No mention of this website, you can be sure. Just new stuff for Snort and Clam. If you don't know how to use these tools, then I am sure Talos can help. They released a program to decrypt the Winbox protocol and failed to mention that Mikrotik fixed the bugs, so all anyone has to do is install the latest firmware. They did not offer the link below to test port 5380.
Buggy routers have an average of 186 bugs each. Not a typo.
You can't secure your network without securing your routers - and your users' routers
by David Braue of CSO Online September 27, 2018
Quoting: "The American Consumer Institute Center for Citizen Research conducted an audit of 186 Wi-Fi routers from 14 different manufacturers, using Insignary’s Clarity application to scan the embedded firmware for unpatched security vulnerabilities. Fully 83 percent of examined routers were found to have known vulnerabilities in their code, with an average of 186 vulnerabilities per router ... the report warned that vendors' frequent usage of open-source code had left many routers exposed." The article cites a trifecta of problems: lots of new vulnerabilities being discovered, router manufacturers often-slow response in fixing these bugs and, of course, router owners who typically don't update the router firmware. Testing was done in July 2018 on the latest firmware for each router, so the real world situation is certainly worse. Only 31 routers had no bugs and they were not identified. I don't know who the American Consumer Institute is and I am always skeptical of a report without an author. There is a chance that this is a disguised press release for Clarity. That they don't mention the good routers also points to this being an ad disguised as a study. And, in the days after the study was released, they blogged about every story in the media that mentioned the study. Just what you would do if the study was really an advertisement.
MikroTik routers attacked abusing bugs with available fixes
Unpatched routers being used to build vast proxy army, spy on networks
by Sean Gallagher of Ars Technica September 5, 2018
Researchers at Netlab 360 have discovered that thousands of MikroTik routers have been compromised by malware attacking a vulnerability first revealed April 2018. MikroTik issued a fix back in April, but more than 370,000 MikroTik devices are online and still vulnerable. Of those, more than 7,500 are actively being spied on by attackers. The spying is done by forwarding a copy of network traffic to a bad guy. This is done using the built-in packet-sniffing capabilities of MikroTik routers. The sniffer, which uses the TZSP protocol, can send a stream of packets to a remote system using Wireshark or other packet capture tools. The vast majority of the packet capture streams were being sent to an IP address in Belize. Also, 239,000 of MikroTik devices have been turned into SOCKS 4 proxies. The malicious proxy network is using the non-standard TCP port 4153. It is not clear what the proxies are being collected for, but they are continuously scanning for other vulnerable routers.
Lots of Cisco bugs
Cisco Releases 16 Security Alerts Rated Critical and High
by Ionut Ilascu of Bleeping Computer September 5, 2018
Cisco published 30 security advisories on vulnerabilities in its products. Half of the bugs are considered high or critical severity. Three are security problems with critical impact. One critical bug affects the RV-series firewalls and routers, specifically RV110W Wireless-N VPN Firewall, RV130W Wireless-N Multifunction VPN Router, and the RV215W Wireless-N VPN Router. The two routers and the firewall are also vulnerable to directory traversal (CVE-2018-0426), command injection (CVE-2018-0424) and information disclosure (CVE-2018-0425) bugs, all having a high severity.
Yet another botnet
New Hakai IoT botnet takes aim at D-Link, Huawei, and Realtek routers
by Catalin Cimpanu for ZDNet September 3, 2018
A new botnet, Hakai, was first spotted in June 2018. Then, in July, it started to exploit a vulnerability in Huawei HG352 routers (CVE-2017-17215). By mid-August it was targeting more devices and vulnerabilities. Hakai now goes after three different bugs in D-Link routers, one of which involves HNAP. D-Link routers that support HNAP do not let you disable it, but D-Link is moving away from HNAP so anyone with a D-Link router should look for new firmware as it might eliminate HNAP. It also targets Realtek routers and IoT devices using a vulnerable version of the Realtek SDK where the miniigd SOAP service allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on the device using a malicious NewInternalClient request. The article does not offer any way of detecting if a specific IoT device is vulnerable or not. The botnet also targets Telnet looking for devices with the port open and simple or default passwords. The Hakai codebase also seems to have leaked as there are two different Hakai-based botnets, Kenjiro and Izuku, spreading online. The article says nothing about what the botnet does to the routers that it infects. It also says nothing about what an infected router might do to the rest of us.
The NSA used hacked routers to help decrypt VPNs
NSA Cracked Open Encrypted Networks of Russian Airlines, AL Jazeera, and Other "High Potential" Targets
by Micah Lee of The Intercept August 15, 2018
The article is about VPNs, but it included a point about using compromised routers to assist in breaking VPN traffic: "In 2014, The Intercept reported on the NSA's plans, dated August 2009, to use an automated system called TURBINE to covertly infect millions of computers with malware. The revelations described a piece of NSA malware called HAMMERSTEIN, installed on routers that VPN traffic traverses. The malware was able to forward VPN traffic that uses the IPSec protocol back to the NSA to decrypt."
The March 2014 article by Ryan Gallagher and Glenn Greenwald referred to here, said this about routers: "The NSA has specifically tailored some of its implants to infect large-scale network routers ... By compromising routers ... the agency can gain covert access to monitor Internet traffic, record the browsing sessions of users, and intercept communications. Two implants the NSA injects into network routers, HAMMERCHANT and HAMMERSTEIN, help the agency to intercept and perform "exploitation attacks" against data that is sent through a Virtual Private Network..." The article also pointed out that the NSA uses hacked routers to deliver malware to targeted machines.
D-Link routers in Brazil hacked to change DNS servers
In-the-wild router exploit sends unwitting users to fake banking site
by Dan Gooding of Ars Technica August 10, 2018
A flaw or flaws in D-Link gateways (a gateway is a combination modem and router) allows bad guys to remotely change the DNS server that the routers tell connected devices to use. DNS translates domain names, such as RouterSecurity.org into numeric IP addresses. All computer communication is based on numeric IP addresses. A small number of techies may hard code DNS servers into their computing devices, but the vast majority of computing devices use the DNS servers assigned to them by the router. A malicious DNS server will translate the name of a bank into the wrong IP address, one that hosts a scam version of the banking website. If a victim logs in to the scam website, the bad guys learn their banking password. According to Radware, bad guys have been using malicious DNS servers to send potential victims to scam versions of two Brazilian bank websites, Banco de Brasil and Unibanco. The web browser will display the correct banking URL while at the scam website, but the use of extended validation certificates should indicate that the displayed site is a scam. I checked. Both banks do use EV certificates so an educated user would not be fooled. Also, the browser should issue a warning about the self-signed certificate used by the scam sites. Known vulnerable D-Link devices include the DSL-2740R, DSL-2640B, DSL-2780B, DSL-2730B, and DSL-526B. Also, the Shuttle Tech ADSL Modem-Router 915 WM. These attacks were first noticed by Radware on June 8, 2018. The bugs being exploited date back to 2015 and have since been fixed. Vulnerable devices can be hacked without any interaction from the end user. In large part the bugs stem from the web interface being available to LAN side devices without authentication. Finally, Goodin claims that specifying your own DNS servers on your computing device over-rides those in the router. This is not always true, certainly not true with my favorite router the Pepwave Surf SOHO.
The Sky is NOT falling
New Method Simplifies Cracking WPA/WPA2 Passwords on 802.11 Networks
by Lawrence Abrams of Bleeping Computer August 6, 2018
This story is sad. The news is trivial, so much so, as to be almost irrelevant. Yet, every outfit did a story that the sky is falling. Not even Steve Gibson was able to put this in perspective and point out how un-important it was. The tech press is truly disgraceful. Consider this statement from the normally reliable Bleeping Computer site "While previous WPA/WPA2 cracking methods required an attacker to wait for a user to login to a wireless network and capture a full authentication handshake, this new method only requires a single frame which the attacker can request from the AP...". The fact is that Wi-Fi attackers never had to wait, they could force any and all currently connected devices off the network. Pretty much any Wi-Fi device would then try to log back in automatically. In fairness, this was a rare article to mention that this newly discovered technique "does not make it easier to crack the password for a wireless network." Many articles outright lied about this. And, some articles mentioned that the new technique only works on routers that have a certain feature enabled. No one bothered to research which routers have that feature enabled. That's not sexy. Have any router companies commented on which, if any of their routers are vulnerable to this new attack? One article had a quote from Eero saying that none of their devices are vulnerable. No one bothered asking any other router vendors. Eero did not publish anything on their website. And, finally, to put this in perspective, let us not forget that Google knows nearly every Wi-Fi password in the world as I blogged back in 2013. And, if Google knows it, the US Government can compel them to turn it over. No hacking needed.
Back to bad news - MikroTik routers at ISPs hacked
Mass MikroTik Router Infection – First we cryptojack Brazil, then we take the World?
by Simon Kenin of Trustwave August 1, 2018
Quoting: "I noticed a huge surge of CoinHive in Brazil. After a quick look I saw that ... these were all MikroTik network devices ... all of these devices were using the same CoinHive sitekey, meaning that they all ultimately mine into the hands of one entity ... the attacker indeed mainly focused on Brazil ... MikroTik routers are used by Internet providers and big organizations, and in this case it seem that the Reddit post's author's ISP had their router compromised ... the exploit was for a vulnerability patched by MikroTik on April 23rd (2018) .... using this exploit you can get unauthenticated remote admin access to any vulnerable MikroTik router ... the attacker used the device's functionality in order to inject the CoinHive script into every web page that a user visited ... This is a warning call and reminder to everyone who has a MikroTik device to patch as soon as possible, this attack may currently be prevalent in Brazil, but during the final stages of writing this blog, I also noticed other geo-locations being affected as well ... Let me emphasize how bad this attack is. The attacker wisely thought that instead of infecting small sites with few visitors, or finding sophisticated ways to run malware on end user computers, they would go straight to the source; carrier-grade router devices. There are hundreds of thousands of these devices around the globe, in use by ISPs and different organizations and businesses ..." This is, to me, a new type of bad. Any website sitting behind a hacked MikroTik router may deliver malware. One thing does not makes sense in this report. Kenin says that all web page passing through an infected router get modified, but, TLS should protect web pages from being modified in-flight.
New thing here - some good news
OpenWrt 18.06 released (Linux OS for your router, first major update in years)
by Brad Linder of Liliputing August 1, 2018
Quoting: "OpenWrt is an open source, Linux-based operating system designed to run on hundreds of routers and other embedded devices. It can add new features to your networking gear and give you more control over the software running on the hardware in your home. This week the developers released OpenWrt 18.06, which is a big step for a couple of reasons." Some changes: Spectre and Meltdown mitigations, improved firmware upgrade procedure, auto rollback functionality, new Linux kernel, an updated toolchain, some type of support for Wireguard VPNs, and, of course, bug fixes.
Bank fails to use VLANs
Hackers Breached Virginia Bank Twice in Eight Months, Stole $2.4M
by Brian Krebs in Krebs on Security July 24, 2018
Hackers used phishing emails to break into The National Bank of Blacksburg in Virginia bank - twice. In May 2016, "The email allowed the intruders to install malware on the victim’s PC and to compromise a second computer at the bank that had access to the STAR Network, a system ... that the bank uses to handle debit card transactions for customers. That second computer had the ability to manage National Bank customer accounts and their use of ATMs and bank cards. Armed with this access, the bank says, hackers were able to disable and alter anti-theft and anti-fraud protections, such as 4-digit personal identification numbers (PINs), daily withdrawal limits, daily debit card usage limits, and fraud score protections." This first break-in cost the bank $569,000. The second break-in was in January 2017. "This time not only did the intruders regain access to the bank’s STAR Network, they also managed to compromise a workstation that had access to Navigator, which is software used by National Bank to manage credits and debits to customer accounts ... the hackers used the bank’s Navigator system to fraudulently credit more than $2 million to various National Bank accounts." Most of the article is about a lawsuit between the bank and its insurance company. Boring. Clearly the problem here is network segmentation or VLANs. No employee should be reading email messages on a computer that has network access to the core banking systems.
Port 5555 being attacked
Open ADB Ports Being Exploited to Spread Possible Satori Variant in Android Devices
by Hubert Lin, Lorin Wu and Vit Sembera of Trend Micro July 23, 2018
Quoting: "... we found a new exploit using port 5555 after detecting two suspicious spikes in activity on July 9-10 and July 15 ... the activity involves the command line utility called Android Debug Bridge (ADB), a part of the Android SDK that handles communication between devices ... the first wave of network traffic came mainly from China and the US, while the second wave primarily involved Korea ... we determined that the malware spreads via scanned open ADB ports .... It attacks ADB by uploading the payload via TCP port 5555 ... It is reasonable to believe that the same author was behind this sample and Satori ... According to data from Shodan, over 48,000 IoT systems are vulnerable to ADB exploitations. Not all vulnerable systems are exposed as they are usually hidden behind routers with NAT ... However ... they can be made accessible either manually or via UPnP NAT traversal. All multimedia devices, smart TVs, mobile phones, and other devices without additional protection are easy targets for this malware regardless of the user's password strength."
Still more attacks on buggy routers
eSentire Observes an Increase in Exploitation Attempts Against Routers
by eSentire July 20, 2018
eSentire observed exploitation attempts targeting consumer routers made by Dasan and D-Link. The D-Link DSL-2750B with firmware 1.01 to 1.03 is susceptible to this attack. So, too are Dasan GPON routers utilizing ZIND-GPON-25xx firmware and some H650 series. Dasan never issued bug fixes. If these devices get attacked, it can result in remote code execution. An article about the D-Link routers appeared in Ars Technica in June (see below).
Huawei Router botnet built exploiting only one bug
Router Crapfest: Malware Author Builds 18,000-Strong Botnet in a Day
by Catalin Cimpanu of Bleeping Computer July 19, 2018
A bad guy built a botnet of over 18,000 routers in the span of a single day. The botnet has been spotted by NewSky Security, and their findings have been confirmed by Qihoo 360 Netlab, Rapid7, and Greynoise. It was built by exploiting a vulnerability in Huawei HG532 routers (CVE-2017-17215). The bug can be exploited via port 37215. This was no zero day, the bug is high profile and had been exploited by many previous botnets. Clearly no one patches their routers. Also, ISPs fail to block incoming connections on port 37215.
Hackers Breach Russian Bank and Steal $1 Million Due to Outdated Router
by Catalin Cimpanu of Bleeping Computer July 19, 2018
What was outdated about the router, no one said. The victim of the hack was PIR Bank. Their network was infiltrated in late May 2018 and the money transferred out on July 3, 2018. The hacker group is known as MoneyTaker, according to Group_IB, and the amount stolen this time was at least $920,000 in US dollars. Group-IB said: "The router had tunnels that allowed the attackers to gain direct access to the bank’s local network .. This scheme has already been used by this group at least three times while attacking banks with regional branch networks." Tunnels? As in VPN?
Press Release: new free Avira security product
Avira Home Guard: One out of every four routers is vulnerable to hackers
by Avira July 19, 2018
This is a press release for a new free product from Avira. It is software that runs on Windows and Android and does a LAN scan to find devices and security issues with them. The text says that many routers have open ports, bit its not clear if the product finds LAN side or WAN side open ports. Avira may be selling FUD. Don't know. Hope to kick the tires on this soon. I later learned that Trend Micro has a similar product that runs on Windows, MacOS, iOS and Android. Trend is upfront of the data that is sent to them, Avira says nothing about this.
Netgear FTP password flaw exploited to steal military documents
Year-old router bug exploited to steal sensitive DOD drone, tank documents
by Sean Gallagher of Ars Technica July 11, 2018
Quoting: "In May, a hacker perusing vulnerable systems with the Shodan search engine found a Netgear router with a known vulnerability - and came away with the contents of a US Air Force captain's computer. The purloined files from the captain - the officer in charge of the 432d Aircraft Maintenance Squadron's MQ-9 Reaper Aircraft Maintenance Unit ... included export-controlled information regarding Reaper drone maintenance. The vulnerability, which makes it possible for an attacker to remotely execute commands and gain access to the root directory of the router via FTP, was disclosed by Netgear over a year ago ... [it] allowed attackers to ... gain access to the local network. They could then either grab files passing over the network or gain access to devices on it." An article in SFGate, from February 2016, Netgear: Add a password or risk losing your data, says the flaw stems from the promise of convenience: "An owner can plug in a flash drive or a hard drive into a home router and access the data remotely. Turning a USB stick into a private cloud is an enticing perk - and one that’s becoming expected as people grow accustomed to accessing their information from anywhere ... When people attempt to remotely access their data, they are prompted to enter a user name and password. If customers have not established their own unique log-ins, Netgear routers grant access without requiring a password at all." Netgear's point of view was that users are responsible for preventing this. They should change the FTP password as the manual says. The article also says that Netgear did not respond to questions about the specific devices affected by the design flaw.
Many routers should be illegal
Those Harder to Mitigate UPnP-Powered DDoS Attacks Are Becoming a Reality
by Catalin Cimpanu of Bleeping Computer June 28, 2018
Every consumer router that I am aware of ships with UPnP enabled. Less tech support calls that way. But, UPnP can be abused to make Denial of Service attacks harder to defend. Quoting: "Security researchers are continuing to see DDoS attacks that leverage the UPnP features of home routers to alter network packets and make DDoS attacks harder to detect and mitigate ... " UPnP was designed for LAN side use only, but many routers are mis-configured and support it on the WAN side. Then too, routers implement it wrong. Specifically, UPnP supports port forwarding to open up a LAN side device directly to the Internet. But, some routers do not validate that the target IP address is really internal, so UPnP allows port forwarding to a public IP address - to a victim of DDos attack. This has been called UPnProxy. This also allows changing the source port number which makes DDoS attack mitigation much harder.
Old D-Link DSL gateways being hacked. No surprise.
Widely used D-Link modem/router under mass attack by potent IoT botnet
by Dan Goodin of Ars Technica June 20, 2018
Bad guys are exploiting a bug in very old D-Link DSL-2750B DSL gateways in an attempt to make them part of the Satori botnet. The bug has been known for roughly 2 years but the devices have been abandoned by D-Link and the ISPs that gave them out. If you have such a device, it needs to be replaced. This is yet another reason to not use any hardware from your ISP, when possible. The bug allows remote command execution without any authorization needed. The vulnerability can be exploited using the "cli" parameter that directly invokes the "ayecli" binary. Vulnerable firmwares are from 1.01 up to 1.03. It is also possible to retrieve the admin password, wifi password, etc. Attack code exploiting the bug was published last month. Netlab 360 first reported Satori was exploiting this bug on June 15th. They also found it exploiting a bug in a XiongMai router. D-Link representatives did not respond to Ars Technica seeking comment. No surprise there. There is no mention of the device on the D-Link website for the US. I know someone who had one of these from Verizon. As of August 2016, it was running firmware version 18.104.22.168.44.2.1 (not a joke) which was released Nov. 14, 2013.
MikroTik router serving as Command and Control
Chinese Cyber-Espionage Group Hacked Government Data Center
by Catalin Cimpanu of Bleeping Computer June 15, 2018
Further proof that VPNFilter was inevitable
VPNFilter's Potential Reach - Malware Exposure in SMB/Consumer-grade Devices
by Bob Rudis of Rapid7 June 7, 2018
Rapid7 scanned the Internet looking for devices from the 11 manufacturers whose routers are known to be vulnerable to VPNFilter. Of those, they counted the ones with an open Telnet port and found just over 453,000 devices. Quoting: "... poorly configured and maintained devices remain at-large just waiting for attackers to regain control ... To ... understand the potential scope of the problem (and not with just VPNFilter), Rapid7 Labs researchers used banner scan results from Project Sonar and Censys to try to get a count of the device families targeted by VPNFilter. The initial numbers for the spread of VPNFilter were in the 500,000 device range and ... the potential for exploitation of all types in these device families (VPNFilter and beyond) is much, much larger ... we picked the most egregious port - telnet - to see what is there since - if telnet is exposed, the devices are seriously, egregiously poorly configured and are likely already compromised in other ways, let alone potential victims for VPNFilter (in any form) ... While we cannot determine if these devices are, in fact, compromised by the latest round of VPNFilter exploits, their mere presence on this singular cleartext port is a clear indicator that we have a long way to go reduce the number of candidates for compromise."
VPNfilter router hack - an inevitable disaster
New VPNFilter malware targets at least 500K networking devices worldwide
by Talos division of Cisco May 23, 2018
If you own a crappy router, it is likely to get hacked. That is the lesson to be learned here. And, by crappy, I mean anything from your ISP or a consumer router. You can stop reading now.
The story: State sponsored bad guys, probably Russians, have hacked a lot of routers (at least 500,000 in 54 countries is the estimate) with really nasty malware. Talos, working with law enforcement and others, found devices from Linksys, Mikrotik, Netgear, TP-Link and QNAP (a NAS not a router) infected. They listed specific models but clearly said their list was incomplete. Nonetheless many articles left out the incomplete part, leaving the impression these were the only vulnerable models. In reality, every device from these vendors needs to be considered vulnerable. There is no easy way to tell if a device is infected with VPNFilter. The exact method of infection is not known and Talos has not completed its research. As shown on the Bugs page here, there are many router bugs just waiting to be exploited. Heck, being a bad guy targeting routers is like being a kid in a candy store. Talos said "...most devices targeted ... have known public exploits or default credentials that make compromise relatively straightforward." In other words, easy pickings. While the initial router infection may have been easy, the malware is, nonetheless, fairly sophisticated. For one thing, it is installed in sections, a main controller is installed first and it then downloads other components. The initial component learns the IP address of where it should download the rest of itself in a very clever way. It downloads an image, and looks in the image metadata for an IP address. Also, this is only the second router malware that can survive reboots of the router. The malware/botnet has been around for a couple years and grew slowly until May 8, 2018 when it increased 28 fold with almost all new infections in the Ukraine.
So what? The malware can do assorted bad things and Talos is not sure it has detected everything. It can certainly steal website credentials and brick the router it is running on. And, as with other router hacks from the last few months, it can be used to hide the true location of bad guys doing bad things. If the FBI breaks your door down thinking you did a bad thing on the Internet, it might be due to VPNFilter. Speaking of the FBI, they said VPNFilter can do "information collection, device exploitation, and blocking network traffic." Finally, it monitors modbus traffic on TCP port 502. Modbus is an Industrial Control Systems (ICS) protocol. A report from JASK said "Western Europe and North America may be at increased risk for a potential ICS attack against critical infrastructure."
Solutions offered: Reboot you router is the big headline everywhere. Good reporters note that all routers should be rebooted, bad reporters point to the few that have been verified as vulnerable. Rebooting is also called power cycling. Simply put, unplug a router from the electricity, wait a short bit and then plug it back in. What is sometimes missing is that this only removes part of the malware, not all of it. Specifically, it removes the add-on components, but not the initially installed component. The malware that is left is harmless in and of itself, but it still leaves the router open to re-infection. Fully removing the malware requires a hard reset to restore the router to a factory fresh state. The downside to this is that any changes made to the default configuration will need to be re-done and hardly anyone knows every change that was made. Some routers can save their current configuration which begs the question if this is restored after a reset, are you still safe? No one has addressed this. Certainly if the malware changed DNS servers, you do not want to restore the bad ones. Finally, a factory refresh may be a waste of time, if the bug that led to the infection in the first place is not fixed. And, again, we do not know how the initial infections are done. Everyone also says to update the firmware. No one points out that this may be useless. Many routers are abandoned and their firmware is not updated and bugs are not fixed. Other solutions are not solutions, just re-cycled words. For example: change default passwords and turn off Remote Management. Well, duh.
Solution not offered: Use a Pepwave Surf SOHO router. Steve Gibson was the only person to question whether a factory reset really removed the malware. He suggested installing new firmware as the best approach for removing existing corrupted firmware. But that begs the questions: if a router already is running the latest firmware, can you re-install it on top of itself? Which leads me to wonder, how long before the malware prevents any firmware updates? Infected devices did TCP scans on ports 23, 80, 2000 and 8080 which Talos wrote are indicative of Mikrotik and QNAP NAS devices. A secure router has no open ports. The Test Your Router page lists many tests you can run against your router looking for open ports. Rebooting a router every now and then is a good idea in general, nothing to do with VPNFilter specifically. There are many router hacks that are removed by rebooting. I recommend periodic reboots on the home page of this site.
Unknown: What does a factory reset of a router really do? Does it install new firmware from a read-only copy? If so, how old is this firmware? Or, does it simply reset the configuration options but make no changes to the installed firmware? NO ONE addressed this issue. Then too, why is it that 3 of the 4 affected companies say nothing about a factory reset in their instructions to their customers? Strange.
Mystery: Who owned toknowall dot com, the domain seized by the FBI? Did the bad guys register it or was an innocent website hacked?
Detecting an infection:
June 30, 2018: Symantec has a VPNFilter checker at www.symantec.com/filtercheck. Interestingly, it is only available via HTTP, not HTTPS. Exactly what it does is not explained, Symantec says only that it tests for the presence of the ssler plugin. How it tests or what exactly it tests is not explained. Also, the plugin is but one component of VPNFilter and Symantec is clear that a router that gets a clean bill of health on their test, "...may still be compromised by other threats or components of VPNFilter." On this page, Symantec says that a list of vulnerable routers is available in their blog. There are multiple mistakes with this. Depending on the release of firmware, a router may or may not be vulnerable. Also, the list of known vulnerable routers is wrong as it omits information from at least two vendors that know exactly the vulnerability that led to infection. They just copied a list from Talos.
June 9, 2018: It seems that you cannot detect the presence of the VPNFilter malware just by looking at your router. The second Talos report mentioned that the router does port forwarding of port 80 to 8888, but did not say if this was visible in the router interface. The report also mentioned that it disables gzip compression, but no one has said how to detect this. Likewise, it tries to downgrade HTTPS to HTTP which is perhaps the easiest means of detection, but many websites force HTTPS all the time. All the detection mentioned anywhere involves monitoring traffic leaving the suspect router, which means connecting the router to something other than a modem. In effect, doing a Man-in-The-Middle attack on the suspect router. The MiTM device could look for the use of http : / / api.ipify.org?format=json which the malware uses to learn its public IP address. It could also look for outgoing requests to the domain seized by the FBI, toknowall dot com. Talos has published many Indicators of Compromise.
Update June 2, 2018: I re-read the Talos blog and it clearly says that rebooted routers can be fully re-infected. Quoting: "If the attempt to the backup domain fails, stage 1 opens a listener that waits for a specific trigger packet to open a connection for the actor to connect interactively to the device ... when any packet arrives on any port, the listener performs a series of checks to identify a trigger packet. If the packet meets a predefined set of criteria, it will extract an IP address from the packet and attempt a stage 2 download." Surely the bad guys know the IP addresses of all infected routers, even those that were re-booted. They may lose track of some because the re-boot may assign a new public IP address, but still, they should be able to fully re-infect many of the rebooted routers. And, the malware listens for a trigger packet on all ports making it impossible to do port scans to find infected devices.
Bug in DrayTek routers is being both exploited and fixed
May 21, 2018: A bug in DrayTek routers was reported by the company and is in the process of being fixed by new firmware. Bad guys have been abusing the flaw to modify the DNS servers in the routers. Details are on the Router Bugs page.
WICKED botnet exploits known bugs in Netgear routers
A Wicked Family of Bots
By Rommel Joven and Kenny Yang of FortiGuard Labs May 17, 2018
If the WICKED botnet can connect to port 8080 on a router it will try to exploit a flaw in Netgear DGN1000 and DGN2200 v1 routers from October 2017. If it can connect to port 8443, it will try to exploit a command injection flaw in Netgear R7000 and R6400 routers from March 2017. If you have a Netgear router, you can test TCP port 8443 and test TCP port 8080. The best result is "Stealth." If one of the ports are open, make sure you have the latest firmware installed.
Harder to detect DDoS attacks thanks to UPnP
New DDoS Attack Method Demands a Fresh Approach to Amplification Assault Mitigation
by Avishay Zawoznik, Johnathan Azaria and Igal Zeifman of Imperva May 14, 2018
It was recently reported that routers with UPnP exposed on their WAN side (the Internet) were being abused by bad guys to make their own customized equivalent of the Tor network to hide their actual location. That was bad enough. Now, Imperva has found that bad guys are also abusing devices that expose UPnP, in DDoS attacks that are harder to detect because the source port is a scam. They searched Shodan and found over 1.3 million devices exposing UPnP on the Internet.
Bugs in Every major router
Zerodium buys bugs, including those in routers. On May 7, 2018, the company CEO, Chaouki Bekrar, tweeted: "Since @Zerodium has added routers to its bounty program, we have received at least one pre-auth RCE #0day exploit for every major router. We all know that the security of routers and IoT devices is completely fucked up but it's still scary to see how deeply fucked they are." Translating: pre-auth means pre-authorization which, in turn, means no password needed. RCE is Remote Code Execution, the most severe type of bug.
Dasan GPON routers being attacked
Vulnerabilities Affecting Over One Million Dasan GPON Routers Are Now Under Attack
by Catalin Cimpanu of Bleeping Computer May 4, 2018
The bug being exploited was disclosed in late April 2018. At first, I did not believe it, my reasons are on the Bugs page. Seems I was wrong and these are real router vulnerabilities. Over a million routers are said to be vulnerable. No article has yet addressed whether the bugs can be exploited remotely, locally or both. The bugs are CVE-2018-10561 and CVE-2018-10562. GPON (Gigabit Passive Optical Network) supports internet connections via fiber optics lines. Most of the vulnerable routers are in Mexico, Kazakhstan, and Vietnam.
Update May 21, 2018: These same routers appear to have another zero day flaw that bad guys are exploiting. See GPON Routers Attacked With New Zero-Day by Catalin Cimpanu for Bleeping Computer.
Hacking a home network
The Digital Vigilantes Who Hack Back
by Nicholas Schmidle for The New Yorker magazine May 7, 2018 issue
The article mentions a security company that got a request from the C.E.O. and general counsel of a multinational corporation. A employee who left the corporation had not returned their company laptop and was suspected of having shared proprietary information with a competitor. They wanted to know if the security company could "hack into the former employee's home network, assess whether the company laptop was connected to it, and, if so, erase any sensitive files." Doing so, would require access to the MAC address of the devices connected to the former employee's home network. That, in turn, requires router access. The security company said, for the article, that from a technical standpoint "such a hack would not be difficult."
Apple FINALLY comes clean, no more AirPort routers
Apple officially discontinues AirPort router line, no plans for future hardware
by Zac Hall of 9to5Mac April 26, 2018
"Apple is officially exiting the wireless router business and selling off its remaining inventory of AirPort products. This includes the AirPort Express, AirPort Extreme, and both models of AirPort Time Capsule." Why would anyone buy the remaining inventory? Especially since the last new model was released five years ago. Apple seems to hate their customers. Back in Nov. 2016, Bloomberg reported that Apple had disbanded the team responsible for developing Apple's routers. Yet, it took till now to make it official. And, even now, they have not lowered the price of remaining inventory. The article says that the router will be supported for years to come, but they are, after all, Apple fanboys. I doubt there will ever be another firmware update to the AirPort routers. As for replacements, needless to say, I recommend the PepWave Surf SOHO router. It is, however, a single device and Peplink does not offer a mesh router system. At the moment, I would recommend Eero, based on my experiences with tech support. However, I have only kicked the tires on Eero, Google Wifi and AmpliFi.
UPnProxy- the UPnP abuse will never die - no progress in 5 years
UPnProxy: Blackhat Proxies via NAT Injections
by Akamai undated (sometime this month)
UPnP was intended to be used on a LAN and, as such, all devices were considered trusted and the protocol has no security at all. It's an old protocol. Back in January 2013 it was discovered that millions of routers were exposing UPnP on their WAN side (the Internet) by mistake. For more on this see the Bugs page. Here we are, 5 years later and this is still true. It seems nothing was done about the millions of buggy/vulnerable routers from 2013. Last month, Symantec wrote about a cyber espionage group known as the Inception Framework abusing UPnP to forward traffic from one router to another to another to another, etc. This lets bad guys hide the true source of their bad deeds. The link and summary are on this page, under March 2018. Now, Akamai is reporting the same thing and they call it UPnProxy. Akamai says it detected over 4.8 million routers that expose various UPnP services via the WAN interface. Again, there should be none, UPnP was only intended for LAN side use. Of these exposed routers, Akamai says over 65,000 home routers are currently being abused. No need for a VPN or Tor when you bounce your Internet data through dozens of other people's routers. This is a gift to spammers, phishers, botnets and the like. It is a bit like having a dedicated bad-guy-only version of Tor. Akamai was kind enough to shame the buggy and vulnerable devices and their manufacturers. Asus is a disgrace, they have a large number of vulnerable devices. Some other manufacturers on the list are D-Link, Ubiquiti, Netgear and ZyXel. Peplink was not on the list. Akamai also blamed ISPs because they are in a position to block UPnP traffic that was never meant to traverse the Internet in the first place. Comcast deserves credit here, they block UDP port 1900. This story did not get nearly enough attention. My guess is that it is beyond the technical comprehension of the many Art History majors that cover technology. Steve Gibson's discussion of UPnProxy (link below) is the only one worth reading/hearing.
- - - -
WHAT YOU CAN DO: How can you tell if your router exposes UPnP to the Internet at large? Steve Gibson has the only test that I am aware of. It is part of his Shields Up! service, the link is below. Every consumer router that I have seen ships with UPnP enabled. So, first off, disable UPnP in your router and then test to see if it was disabled on the Internet/WAN side of the house. Akamai noted that UDP port 1900 is what makes a vulnerable router discoverable. Click here to test if UDP port 1900 is open on your router. Also, check if your router is doing any port forwarding at all. Nothing to do with UPnProxy, all forwarded ports are holes in the router firewall and thus potential security weaknesses. For an Asus router go to System Log, then the Port Forwarding tab. If you see nothing, then you are safe, at the moment. In this screen shot, we see five ports are being forwarded. These are normal forwarding rules in that the destination is a computer on the LAN - they all start with 192.168.1. Victims of UPnProxy would see a public IP address in the "Redirect to" column. I have no idea why UDP port 54051 is being forwarded on this Asus router. For a TP-Link router, go to the Advanced tab, then NAT forwarding, then UPnP. Again, nothing being forwarded is good. In this screen shot, we see two forwarding rules, both to an "Internal IP Address" (starting with 192.168.0). I don't know if any routers let you disable or delete a UPnP created forwarding rule. As we can see in these two screen shots, neither Asus nor TP-Link supports this. But, at least they do report on UPnP created port forwarding. I tried the emulator for a couple Linksys Smart routers and they do not seem to report on this at all. Exposing UPnP also opens up your router to attack which Akamai described in their report. It basically converts Remote Administration to Local Administration. To defend against this, change the port number(s) used for local administration and change the LAN side IP address of the router. And, of course, change the router admin password, and, when possible, the router admin userid too. All that said, the Defensive Computing thing to do is to replace a router exposing UPnP on the Internet. It shows the manufacturer is incompetent.
The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming
Russian State-Sponsored Cyber Actors Targeting Network Infrastructure Devices
by the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI and the National Cyber Security Centre in the UK April 16, 2018
Russian cyber actors do not need to leverage zero-day vulnerabilities or install malware to exploit devices. Instead, they take advantage of: devices with legacy unencrypted protocols or unauthenticated services, devices insufficiently hardened before installation, and devices no longer supported with security patches. These factors allow access to both intellectual property and U.S. critical infrastructure that supports the health and safety of the U.S. population. Network devices are ideal targets. A malicious actor with presence on an organization’s gateway router has the ability to monitor, modify, and deny traffic to and from the organization. Whoever controls the routing infrastructure of a network essentially controls the data flowing through the network.
The Russians, like many others, are abusing Cisco Smart Install enabled devices. There is more about abusing Smart install below, dated April 6th. Details on the Smart Install flaws are on the Bugs page under March 2018. Also being attacked are Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) and Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). The National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) is an arm of British intelligence agency GCHQ.
From my Defensive Computing perspective, there is nothing special about Russia, all Internet-facing devices are scanned all the time. I blogged about this last month, Routers are constantly being probed - examining a firewall log
Hacked routers with malicious DNS servers lead to Android malware
Roaming Mantis uses DNS hijacking to infect Android smartphones
By Suguru Ishimaru of Kaspersky Lab Securelist April 16, 2018
Android malware, dubbed Roaming Mantis, is distributed through router DNS hijacking. When a user attempts to access any website via a compromised router, they are redirected to a malicious website. For example, if a web browser tried to access www.securelist.com, it would be redirected to a rogue server that had nothing to do with the security research blog. The nature of the malicious website is hidden from the victim because the web browser displays the original URL. The malicious web page implores the victim to update to the latest version chrome. Victims that install the banking malware have their login credentials stolen. The malware can read SMS messages so it also steals the secret verification code used for two-factor authorization. The article goes into details on the malware, but says nothing about how the routers may have been hacked. It also offers bad advice: "If you have any concerns about the DNS settings on your router, please check the user manual and verify that your DNS settings haven't been tampered with, or contact your ISP for support." Better advice is to use the DNS server tester pages listed here to learn what your DNS servers are.
Hacking routers is the latest thing among bad guys
Cyber-Espionage Groups Are Increasingly Leveraging Routers in Their Attacks
By Catalin Cimpanu of Bleeping Computer April 12, 2018
According to Costin Raiu, director of the Global Research and Analysis Team at Kaspersky Lab, the number of Advanced Persistent Threats leveraging routers for attacks has gone steadily up in the past year, and the tactic has become quite widespread in 2018. Maybe I should put ads on this site. Their research uncovered the LuckyMouse APT which uses routers for hosting their command and control servers, which, Raiu said, is unusual. They believe that the routers were hacked through an SMB vulnerability which allowed the bad guys to upload CGI scripts. He also pointed out that the US government released a document saying that router attacks have been the preferred attack vector for a number of malicious actors for a number of years, yet, the number of reports about router malware and router attacks are few and far between. Thus, Raiu concludes that there's a lot going on that we don't see.
Looks like the Boston Red Sox need better computer nerds
The Red Sox clubhouse's Wi-Fi password does not rank high for creativity
by Nik DeCosta-Klipa of Boston.com April 12, 2018
Yankee manager, Aaron Boone, was being interviewed after a game at Fenway Park against the Boston Red Sox when the camera showed a bulletin board on the wall next to Boone. On the bulletin board was the Wi-Fi network name and password. This got some attention because the password was the miserably insecure - "baseball". The Red Sox could hardly have chosen a worse password. They took it well, however, tweeting "Guess we need a new WiFi password". As I explain here on the Wi-Fi encryption page, Wi-Fi passwords need to be at least 14 characters long to resist brute force attacks. However, for a high value target such as the visitors clubhouse at Fenway Park, I would certainly go with a longer password. When you consider all the schools near Fenway Park (Harvard and MIT come to mind), churning out fresh new techies, I would make the password still longer. The password was not their only mistake, an SSID of "clubhouse" gives away too much information. Why not call it "VisitorsClubhouse" and take away all mystery. Better network names would have been BlueSky or ColdWeather or JoesNetwork. See more about picking an SSID. Some of the suggestions on Twitter for new passwords, shown below, were not half bad.
ISPs keep customers ignorant
What most people think it looks like when you change router's admin password, apparently
by Kat Hall of The Register April 12, 2018
A survey, by the British comparison website Broadband Genie, reported that 82 per cent of responders have never changed their router password. The article is unclear however about whether it is referring to the router password or to a Wi-Fi password. The survey also found that 52 per cent have not changed their Wi-Fi network name (SSID). This advertises to bad guys that the owner of this network is technically clueless, which may invite attack. 48 per cent of responders said they were baffled as to why they would need to make these changes. A pessimist might assume that ignorant customers make fewer tech support calls. This article is just as guilty as the ISPs it is trying to shame. It notes that bad things can happen if the DNS servers in the router are changed, but fails to mention that you can test for this fairly easily. My Test Your Router page lists many websites that report on the currently used DNS servers.
Two router surveys by PC Magazine
April 11, 2018: PC Magazine just published their Readers' Choice Awards 2018: Routers and NAS Devices. Asus won the router award for the seventh straight year. Just days earlier, Akamai issued a white paper, UPnProxy: Blackhat Proxies via NAT Injections that detailed problems with UPnP. The Akamai paper listed buggy devices. Asus had quite a few buggy routers: DSL-AC68R, DSL-AC68U, DSL-N55U, DSL-N55U-B, MTK7620, RT-AC3200, RT-AC51U, RT-AC52U, RT-AC53, RT-AC53U, RT-AC54U, RT-AC55U, RT-AC55UHP, RT-AC56R, RT-AC56S, RT-AC56U, RT-AC66R, RT-AC66U, RT-AC66W, RT-AC68P, RT-AC68R, RT-AC68U, RT-AC68W, RT-AC87R, RT-AC87U, RT-G32, RT-N10E, RT-N10LX, RT-N10P, RT-N10PV2, RT-N10U, RT-N11P, RT-N12, RT-N12B1, RT-N12C1, RT-N12D1, RT-N12E, RT-N12HP, RT-N12LX, RT-N12VP, RT-N14U, RT-N14UHP, RT-N15U, RT-N16, RT-N18U, RT-N53, RT-N56U, RT-N65R, RT-N65U, RT-N66R, RT-N66U, RT-N66W, RTN13U, SP-AC2015 and the WL500. Peplink, my preferred router vendor, was not on the radar screen of PC magazine readers.
Throwing salt on the wound, two days later the magazine came out with their Business Choice Awards for routers, which also recommended Asus. This is crazy, Asus does not make Business class routers. The magazine claimed to have surveyed admins and IT folks, maybe they should use Facebook to find real IT folks. Then again, maybe it tells us more about PC Magazine than it does about Asus.
Cisco devices are being hacked all over the world
What happened to the Internet: attack on Cisco switches
by Kaspersky April 6, 2018
At the end of March 2018 Cisco released 34 bug fixes of which three were deemed critical. Details are on the Router Bugs page. By April 6th, there was a massive attack against Cisco switches. These devices are used in data-centers across the globe. The attacks are exploiting a bug in the Cisco Smart Install Client software. The Smart Install protocol does not require authentication and should not be exposed to the Internet. Yet, there it is. Kaspersky blames the nerds working in datacenters for failing limit access to TCP port 4786. Or, they should have disabled Smart Install altogether. A simple command tests if Smart Install is running and another command can disable it. Hackers have attacked networks in a number of countries including Iran where they left the image of a U.S. flag on screens along with a warning: "Don't mess with our elections." Some hackers claimed to have fixed the bug on vulnerable devices in the U.S. and UK. One report said the flaw apparently affected 200,000 router/switches. Talos found 168,000 devices exposed by the Cisco Smart Install Client. Motherboard reported 166,000. Attackers are able to reset the devices back to their default configuration and display a message to the victims. The attack on some ISPs cut off Internet access for their subscribers. Talos observed hackers exploiting the vulnerability to target critical infrastructure. Joseph Cox of Motherboard said that the attack seems relatively unsophisticated. Taols, which is owned by Cisco, believes that some of the attacks are from nation-state actors. Sounds better than a bunch of 14 year old kids.
The better to spy on you, my dear
Chinese city shops ordered to start using government-approved routers
by Shannon Liao of The Verge April 5, 2018
MikroTik routers used in DDoS attacks
Mirai-Variant IoT Botnet Used to Target Financial Sector in January 2018
by Priscilla Moriuchi and Sanil Chohan of the Insikt Group. April 5, 2018
In late January 2018, three European financial institutions were hit by DDoS attacks powered by a new variant of the Mirai botnet. The botnet that hit the first company consisted of at least 13,000 devices. The Insikt Group used IP geolocation, service banners from Shodan, and additional metadata to analyze the composition of the botnet and found that the attack was 80 percent comprised of compromised MikroTik routers, with the remaining 20 percent composed of various IoT devices ranging from vulnerable Apache and IIS web servers, to routers from Ubiquity, Cisco, and ZyXEL. All of the compromised MikroTik devices had TCP port 2000 open, which is usually reserved for MikroTik’s bandwidth test server protocol. This port is usually enabled by default in new MikroTik devices. No MikroTik devices with TCP 2000 disabled (a recommended security measure in production environments) were discovered within the botnet.
Multiple reports of DNS hijacking on Asus routers
Asus RT-AC66U DNS hacking
by Mpuk7 at the SmallNetBuilder forum March 10, 2018
Because I maintain this website, someone emailed me asking about their Asus router that had its DNS hijacked. As we both looked into it, there seems to be a lot of that going around. The person who posted this claimed to have the latest Asus firmware, a long password and they had even changed the default router userid. Of course, the latest firmware, at least with consumer routers, always includes old software with known bugs. I am not qualified to review the Asus router log, but this one made it obvious the router was running some old software with known bugs. The router had remote administration enabled, which is almost always a mistake. Two interesting quotes from these reports: "I tried Asus support but they were immensely useless" and another person said Asus was as helpful as a chocolate teapot :-) Two of the bad DNS servers were 22.214.171.124 and 126.96.36.199.
Update March 16, 2018: David Redekop suggested this might be the flaw that was abused here: ASUS Patches Root Command Execution Flaws Haunting Over a Dozen Router Models. Routers enabled for Remote Administration using HTTP rather than HTTPS would be vulnerable to this.
MikroTik routers hacked to infect Windows PCs
Kaspersky Lab uncovers Slingshot, the spy that came in from the router
by Kaspersky March 9, 2018
It is not known how the MikroTik routers were hacked. Currently routers are configured using either a web interface or a mobile app. In the previous century they were administered with Windows software. The hacked routers were administered with Windows software known as Winbox. Winbox, for whatever reason, downloads some Windows executable files (DLLs) from the router. The hacked routers had malicious DLLs that infected the Windows computer used to configure the router. This was professional spyware of the highest caliber. The infections seem to be very targeted, with only around 100 PCs known to be infected. The spyware was extremely effective at stealthy information gathering, hiding its traffic in marked data packets that it can intercept without trace from everyday communications. Operation slingshot seems to have started in 2012 and was still active in February 2018. The MikroTik router firmware no longer installs software on Windows computers. Winbox is still a thing, but they also have a web interface. Kaspersky software can defend against this. So too, can a Chromebook.
Ellen Nakashima, of the Washington Post, wrote Russian spies hacked the Olympics and tried to make it look like North Korea did it. Quoting: "Apart from accessing the computers, GRU cyber-operators also hacked routers in South Korea last month ... according to Western intelligence agencies. Such access could enable intelligence collection or network attacks..." The article also has a quote from security expert Jake Williams of Rendition Infosec: "Anyone who controls a router would be able to redirect traffic for one or more selected targets or cause total disruption in the network by stopping the routing entirely."
An old D-Link HNAP flaw exploited by a new botnet
Masuta : Satori Creators' Second Botnet Weaponizes A New Router Exploit.
by Ankit Anubhav, Principal Researcher, NewSky Security January 23, 2018
Quoting: "We analyzed two variants of an IoT botnet named 'Masuta' where we ... discovered a router exploit being weaponized for the first time in a botnet campaign ... The weaponized bug introduced in PureMasuta botnet is in the HNAP (Home Network Administration Protocol) which itself is based on the SOAP protocol. It is possible to craft a SOAP query which can bypass authentication by using hxxp://purenetworks.com/ HNAP1/GetDeviceSettings. Also, it is feasible to run system commands (leading to arbitrary code execution) because of improper string handling. When both issues are combined, one can form a SOAP request which first bypasses authentication, and then causes arbitrary code execution."
MikroTik and Ubiquiti Routers defaced due to default passwords
Tens of Thousands of Defaced MikroTik and Ubiquiti Routers Available Online
by Catalin Cimpanu of Bleeping Computer January 10, 2018
If you don't change the default password, you get what you deserve. It seems that, as a prank, someone has been changing the names of routers. Ankit Anubhav of cyber-security company NewSky Security, first ran across this back in July. He estimates that over 40,000 Ubiquiti routers have been defaced along with 7,300 MikroTik routers. The names given to the routers are "HACKED FTP server," "HACKED-ROUTER-HELP-SOS-WAS-MFWORM-INFECTED," and "HACKED-ROUTER-HELP-SOS-HAD-DEFAULT-PASSWORD."
Satori botnet abusing routers
Warning: Satori, a Mirai Branch Is Spreading in Worm Style on Port 37215 and 52869
by Li Fengpei of Qihoo 360 Netlab December 5, 2017
Quoting: "About 12 hours ago ... we noticed a new version of Satori (a mirai variant which we named Satori), starting to propagate very quickly on port 37215 and 52869. Two new exploits ... have been added ... during last recent 12 hours we have seen 263,250 different IPs scanning port 37215, and 19,403 IPs scanning port 52869." They have not yet disclosed information on the flaw involving port 37215. The bug being exploited on port 52869 is derived from CVE-2014-8361. It is not clear, to me at least, if this is the same botnet that Dan Goodin wrote about below.
UPDATE: Script Kiddie Responsible for Large Satori Botnet by Lucian Constantin in Security Boulevard December 22, 2017. Security researchers at Check Point Software believe that the Satori botnet of more than 250,000 routers was created by an amateur hacker with limited skills. The botnet abuses a known bug in the Miniigd UPnP SOAP service on port 52869 and a new bug in Huawei HG532 home gateways on port 37215. Huawei exposed a configuration service intended to only be used on the LAN side to the Internet. It is scary that a relatively unskilled attacker can build a large botnet capable of devastating attacks. It highlights the poor state of router and IoT security across the internet.
Starbucks Wi-Fi hacked in Buenos Aires
Starbucks Wi-Fi hijacked customers' laptops to mine cryptocoins
by Lisa Vaas of Sophos December 14, 2017
A botnet spreads by attacking un-named flaws in Huawei Home Gateways
100,000-strong botnet built on router 0-day could strike at any time
by Dan Goodin of Ars Technica December 5, 2017
First off, clickbait. There are many botnets that could strike at any time. It is, sadly, the new normal. The buggy devices are the Huawei EchoLife Home Gateway and the Huawei Home Gateway. The bug was first disclosed by Check Point Software on Nov. 27, 2017. The botnet spreads both by abusing a bug and also by guessing 65,000 different userid/password combinations. It does not abuse Remote Administration. This is the second botnet, after Reaper, to spread by abusing flaws in routers. There is much we do not know:
--There are multiple Huawei Home Gateway models and it is not clear if some or all are buggy
--What firmware versions have the bug?
--What userid/passwords is the botnet guessing
--Defense. The article says nothing at all about defending against the flaw. Typical of clickbait.
--Does Huawei know about the bug? Acknowledge it? Have they issued a fix?
UPnP abused by Windows malware
McAfee Discovers Pinkslipbot Exploiting Infected Machines as Control Servers; Releases Free Tool to Detect, Disable Trojan
by Sanchit Karve of McAfee Labs June 16, 2017
Pinkslipbot (also known as QakBot or QBot) is a notorious banking-credential harvester that has been active since 2007. It primarily targets users and enterprises located within the United States. The malware uses a new and complicated cloaking strategy to hide the location of its Command and Control servers. It uses two layers of HTTPS proxies made up of around 500,000 infected PCs. Anyone trying to find the IP address of the control server will instead see the proxy system shielding it. Pinkslipbot uses universal plug and play (UPnP) to open ports in the router firewall.
For years, the CIA has targeted routers
CIA has been hacking into Wi-Fi routers for years, leaked documents show
by Zack Whittaker of ZDNet June 15, 2017
Secret documents, dated 2012 and leaked by WikiLeaks, reveal that the CIA has been targeting and compromising routers for years in an effort to carry out clandestine surveillance. One tool, known as CherryBlossom, allows the agency to monitor a target's Internet activity, redirect their browser and scan for information. The documents, which have not been verified, suggest this has been going on for years. CherryBlossom runs on 25 router models from 10 different manufacturers, and it's likely that modifications would allow the implant to run on at least 100 more routers. Among the brands are Asus, Belkin, Buffalo, Dell, Dlink, Linksys, Motorola, Netgear, Senao and US Robotics.
Privacy issues with Trend Micro software in Asus routers
Review: ASUSWRT router firmware
by Daniel Aleksandersen of Ctrl.blog May 2, 2017
The stock firmware that runs Asus routers is called ASUSRWRT and it has a somewhat hidden privacy issue. If you use any of the following features, it will collect and transmit data about which websites you visit to Trend Micro: Apps/traffic Analysis, Bandwidth Monitor, Network Analyzer, Network Protection (AiProtection), Parental Controls (including time scheduling), Quality-of-Service, Web History and Network Map. This is spelled out in a EULA from Trend Micro. If the software thinks a website URL is potentially fraudulent, it sends the URL to Trend. In addition, executable files or content that is identified as potential malware is also send to Trend. Finally, email messages identified as spam or malware are sent to Trend, despite the fact that they may contain sensitive data. Quoting: "The EULA also contains language holding the router's owner responsible for notifying their friends, family, and house guests who connect to the internet through the ASUS router that any network activity may be recorded and shared with Trend Micro."
More abuse of TR-069
Thousands of Hacked Home Routers are Attacking WordPress Sites
by Mark Maunder of Wordfence April 11, 2017
We have seen this story before. ISPs leave the TR-069 port, number 7547, open to the world at large rather than restricting access to themselves. Just more support for my recommendation to avoid using a router from an ISP. Wordfence reports that Shodan found over 41 million devices are listening on port 7547.
Dealing with a hacked Netgear router
Router assimilated into the Borg, sends 3TB in 24 hours
by Chris Lee of Ars Technica February 26, 2017
Interesting story by someone who is not a networking expert. His Netgear R6400 router was hacked. The article goes into the symptoms of the problem and the debugging steps that he took to figure out the problem. After realizing the router had been hacked, a factory reset did not fix the problem which tells me that the router was running malicious firmware. DD-WRT was not much help. In the end, the router was a paperweight.
FTC accuses D-Link of poor security
Feds Accuse D-Link of Failing to Properly Secure Routers and Webcams
by Chris Morran of consumerist.org January 5, 2017
Federal regulators have accused D-Link of leaving its routers and webcam devices vulnerable to hackers. A lawsuit alleges that D-Link "failed to take reasonable steps to protect their routers and IP cameras from widely known and reasonably foreseeable risks of unauthorized access." D-Link is also accused of misleading the public about the security of their devices. This is going to trial in January 2019.
This is the second time the FTC has gone after insecure routers. In February 2016, they went after Asus for their insecure routers. At least Asus took their medicine, D-Link, in contrast, cried foul.
Thailand ISP ignores router flaws
Router vulnerabilities disclosed in July remain unpatched
by Michael Mimoso of Kaspersky Threatpost January 17, 2017
The first sentence of this article is all you need to read: "Details on serious vulnerabilities in a number of routers freely distributed by a major Thai ISP were published on Monday after private disclosures made to the vendors in July went unanswered." As I say elsewhere on this site, don't use a router provided by your ISP. TrueOnline, the largest broadband company in Thailand, gives their customers three buggy routers: ZyXel P660HN-T v1, ZyXel P660HN-T v2 and Billion 5200 W-T. Multiple bugs (default admin accounts and command injection vulnerabilities) were found and disclosed by Pedro Ribeiro of Agile Information Security. Most of the vulnerabilities can be exploited remotely, some without authentication. It is likely that the same flaws exist in other ISP customized routers in other countries. A ZyXel representative told Threatpost the router models are no longer supported. Billion ignored a request for comment from Threatpost.
In October 2016, Brian Krebs wrote about malware that targeted Asus and Linksys routers. The software turned the routers into SOCKS proxies, which help bad guys hide their location, much like Tor. Bad guys were using these hacked routers for "or a variety of badness, from proxying Web traffic destined for cybercrime forums to testing stolen credit cards at merchant Web sites." Plus, access to these hacked routers was being sold in exchange for Bitcoin.
This is why Router Security matters
IoT Home Router Botnet Leveraged in Large DDoS Attack
by Daniel Cid of Sucuri September 1, 2016
This is a blog post about a DDoS attack that Sucuri fought off for a client. The attack used three different botnets, one of them composed of routers. Sucuri detected over 11,000 compromised routers from eight different vendors. Quoting: "The largest number of routers being exploited came from Huawei-based routers. They varied between versions: HG8245H, HG658d, HG531, etc." Other routers were from MikroTik, Ubiquiti, NuCom, Dell SonicWall, VodaFone, Netgear, and Cisco-IOS.
Building router hacked
Building automation systems
are so bad IBM hacked one for free
by Darren Pauli of The Register Feb 11, 2016
Quoting: "An IBM-led penetration testing team has thoroughly owned an enterprise building management network in a free assessment designed to publicize the horrid state of embedded device security ... they found exposed administration ports ... gaining access to a D-Link panel enabled to allow remote monitoring ... by adding an extra carriage return after the page request it was possible to bypass the router's authentication. They found command injection vulnerabilities in the router and found a list of commands in the firmware source code. They found a cleartext password in the router's var directory that not only granted more router pwnage but, thanks to password-reuse, allowed them to compromise the building management system." No mention of who made the router, let alone a model number.
In August 2015, Jeff Atwood blogged about how two people he knew fell victim to compromised routers (see Welcome to The Internet of Compromised Things). In one case, the infected router inserted ads onto all HTTP web pages. Quoting:
It's becoming more and more common to see malware installed not at the server, desktop, laptop, or smartphone level, but at the router level ... I write about this because it recently happened to two people I know ... This is way more evil genius than infecting a mere computer. If you can manage to systematically infect common home and business routers, you can potentially compromise every computer connected to them. Router malware is the ultimate man-in-the-middle attack ... [bad guys] can direct you to phishing websites at will - if you think you're on the "real" login page for the banking site you use, think again.
In May 2015, Scott Hanselman wrote about an infected router at his local sandwich shop that "... started to redirect me to a fake 'update your flash' and download a 'Install flashplayer_10924_ i13445851_il345.exe' malware file .... This affects their PoS (Point of Sale) system, tablets, iPhones ... It's a MitM attack (Man in the Middle) where x number of HTTP GETs work fine and then every few hundred the router returns it's own HTML."
Victims don't have do anything to have their computing devices infected with malware. A hacked router can corrupt the self-update mechanism of either the operating system or a specific application. In June 2015 a case like this got a lot of publicity; the pre-installed Swift keyboard on Samsung smartphones self-updated in an insecure way that could be corrupted by anyone able to modify network traffic. A hacked router is one source, so too is a malicious ISP, a bad guy on the LAN or malware running on another LAN-resident device. Because the keyboard software ran with very high system privileges there was almost no end to what malware it was tricked into installing could do.
Australian ISP Optus screws up
Optus must hire checkbox champion after epic router, voicemail borking
by By Darren Pauli of The Register March 27, 2015
Australia's second-biggest telco, Optus, shipped hundreds of thousands of routers with open internet ports and default credentials. Going back as far as 2008, they shipped 300,000 Cisco and Netgear modems that exposed management ports and contained default access credentials.
When visiting popular websites, the router can install malware by prompting users to install a plug-in. Here is a screen shot of this from 2012 in Brazil. See also Info Stealer Poses as Google Chrome Installer from Trend Micro written in May 2012.