|Router Security||What can go wrong||
Website by |
Every bad thing you can imagine happening to a computing device, can happen to one that sits behind a hacked router. The only limit is the imagination of the bad guys.
A router sits between the Internet and all the computing devices on a LAN. To illustrate what can go wrong, consider two people who speak different languages communicating through an interpreter. If the interpreter is malicious, they can manipulate either person into thinking anything.
Spying on your activities (goes without saying).
A victim on the LAN can think they are at website A, when they are really seeing a malicious copy of it. Kiss that password good-bye.
If a computer is downloading software, the router can trick it into downloading a malicious copy of the software.
An infected router may do nothing to its owner other than slow down the Internet connection. A big reason for taking over routers (and IoT devices too) is to use them in distributed denial of service attacks.
If the router is sharing files, those files can be visible to an attacker.
April 16, 2018: The New York Times, reporting on Russian hacking (U.S.-U.K. Warning on Cyberattacks Includes Private Homes) quotes Howard Marshall, the deputy assistant director of the cyber division at the FBI: "Once you own the router, you own all the traffic, to include the chance to harvest credentials and passwords ... It is a tremendous weapon in the hands of an adversary."
April 16, 2018: A joint Technical Alert was issued by the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI and the British National Cyber Security Centre - Russian State-Sponsored Cyber Actors Targeting Network Infrastructure Devices. It had a section called, Own the Router, Own the Traffic, which details what can go wrong: "Network devices are ideal targets. Most or all organizational and customer traffic must traverse these critical devices. A malicious actor with presence on an organization's gateway router has the ability to monitor, modify, and deny traffic to and from the organization. A malicious actor with presence on an organization's internal routing and switching infrastructure can monitor, modify, and deny traffic to and from key hosts inside the network and leverage trust relationships to conduct lateral movement to other hosts ... An actor controlling a router between ICS-SCADA sensors and controllers in a critical infrastructure - such as the Energy Sector - can manipulate the messages, creating dangerous configurations that could lead to loss of service or physical destruction. Whoever controls the routing infrastructure of a network essentially controls the data flowing through the network."
Federal networks susceptible to router hacks, DHS says by Derek B. Johnson of FCW March 6, 2018. The Department of Homeland Security just released a report from 2016 on network infrastructure security. The report (see bellow) says that "as security practices for individual computers and devices have hardened, nation-state hackers have adapted by focusing on weaker network infrastructure devices, like routers, that 'are often working in the background with little oversight -- until network connectivity is broken or diminished'." A letter, released along with the report, quoted the agency head: "for several years, network infrastructure devices have been the attack-vector of choice" for advanced persistent threat hacking groups to conduct denial of service attacks, data theft and alteration of data moving across federal networks.
The report referred to above is The Increasing Threat to Network Infrastructure Devices and Recommended Mitigations. One section details what can happen after a router is hacked: "If the network infrastructure is compromised, malicious hackers or adversaries can gain full control of the network infrastructure enabling further compromise of other types of devices and data and allowing traffic to be redirected, changed, or denied. Possibilities of manipulation include denial-of-service, data theft, or unauthorized changes to the data. Intruders with infrastructure privilege and access can impede productivity and severely hinder reestablishing network connectivity ... Malicious actors with persistent access to network devices can reattack and move laterally after they have been ejected from previously exploited hosts."
In May 2017, Trend Micro wrote "A compromised home router can open up the user to significant consequences: information or even identity theft, malicious sites and advertisements, VoIP fraud, and more. Cybercriminals can also profit by using compromised home routers in for-profit distributed denial-of-service attacks (DDoS) or as part of a rented botnet. Botnets have become quite profitable ... "
In March 2013, Leon Juranic of Defense Code documented flaws with UPnP. His document started with this: Hacking network devices is a sort of the Holy Grail for hackers, because once we're in a network device like a router or switch, we can (more-or-less) overtake all machines behind it. Network traffic sniffing, man-in-the-middle attacks, binary infection on-the-fly, further network penetration, so on, and so on... His document included a huge list of routers vulnerable to particular UPnP bug. No Peplink routers were on the list.
DOCUMENTED EXAMPLES OF ROUTER HACKSSee the Routers in the news page.
An infected router can setup a bad guy as a Man-In-The-Middle. Here is a funny story of what one person did when a neighbor used their Wi-Fi network without permission: Upside-Down-Ternet. In this case, the person whose Wi-Fi was being stolen, was the Man-In-The-Middle, and he was playing a joke on the thief - every image the Wi-Fi thief saw, was upside-down. Pretty darn funny.
TARGET TAILS LINUX
If I ran a spy agency, one group of people that I would most want to spy one would be those downloading the Tails version of Linux which is used to access TOR. In fact, Tails is the best way to access the TOR network. Tails lives at https://tails.boum.org which (as of June 2015) resolves to IP address 18.104.22.168. The Internet thinks this IP address is in the United States, specifically in Seattle, Washington.
A malicious router could easily change every outgoing packet destined to 22.214.171.124 and replace the legitimate IP address with one for a malicious copy of the tails.boum.org website. A victim would never know they were looking at a scam website with scam checksums for the modified hacked ISO at the scam site.
Then again, if I ran a spy agency, I would have the ISP do this for me. Much less work than hacking a router and it lets me corrupt far more copies of Tails Linux.